Go for it!
Well, Miss Airhead, I’d advise you not to go to Raqqa to spread your message of peace and love.
Sounds like she could fit right in with the MSM and Obama’s Muslims are peaceful crowd.
Actually, the fact that a beauty queen is being asked about terrorism is ludicrous enough. Considering that, her answer could have been a lot worse.
Go for it!
“”I know as Miss USA I can always spread a message of hope and love and peace-———————”
—
A typical bimbo answer.
She would be better off saying nothing.
.
True Story:
At the funeral service of Yassar Arafat, Andrea Mitchell was reporting from a rooftop of some Palestinian building. As a helicopter was trying to land in the courtyard, the crowd would surge, causing the help to climb back to a hover. This happened two or three times, and Don Imus, who was on the phone with her, asked her why she didn’t just go down an reason with the crowd.
BWA-HAHAHA. You should have seen her face as she tried to contort a politically correct answer. Imus kept putting the question to her while she kept stumbling.
HILAREOUS!
She’s good looking enough to go straight into the caliph’s hareem.
Typical liberal BS..tell Miss USA to go to Syria and tell that message directly to ISIS..they will be laughing their a@@es off as they behead her
Shouldn’t have cut her hair...
1 Corinthians 11:15
But if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering.
Just a typical MISS message. They are programmed to say fluffy flowery inane things like that. Imagine if one said “I think the violent subhuman savages are awful and should not be allowed in our country” she would never win the prize and would be hounded, harassed and intimidated until she never said anything again.
At best her answer is stupidly and dangerously naive.
Take your 10 bucks and your Kum-by-ya Muzzie outreach crap and beat it, toots.
Miss USA is a cutie, pity she has such an empty head...
i a sure the jihadis would love to spread something else....
She’s probably been dating John “You Have a Friend” Kerry.
Know Thy Enemy
JAKUB GRYGIEL
The modern Western penchant for trusting in the equal rationality of all is strategic folly. Aeschylus understood this well.
Good strategy requires a sound understanding of one’s rivals. A rival in any walk of life is, in a sense, an interlocutor. To engage him effectively in debate one must understand his speech and reasoning patterns. Without that knowledge, conversation is at best pointless, at worst self-defeating. So it is in strategy. It is futile to engage in competition with a rival power without having at least an inkling about his thoughts, fears, and desires.
The modern Western penchant for trusting in the equal rationality of all suggests otherwise. According to this conceit, there is no reason to plumb the nature of an enemy’s thinking because it is no different in essence from one’s own. But this is wrong. A rival’s response to one’s strategy is not predictable as a simply rational and universal reaction that can be generalized and grasped with relative ease. Rival states or groups respond to similar actions in different ways based on their culture, worldview, history, and the proclivities of their leaders. Good strategy, as Bernard Brodie once put it, “presupposes good anthropology and good sociology.”
One of the earliest examples we have of “good anthropology”—or rather, of being able to put oneself in the mind of the enemy—is in a 5th-century BCE Greek tragedy, The Persians, written by Aeschylus. ...
http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/01/23/know-thy-enemy/
filty lowlife scumbag gutterwhore idiot alert..............