Posted on 01/13/2015 3:43:35 AM PST by mykroar
The networks president, David Nevins, says the shows writer-producer Alex Gansa might find a fresh antagonist for CIA case officer Carrie Mathison (Claire Danes) to tackle when the show returns later this year. But the executive also firmly emphasized a decision has not yet been made and the storys villain will be chosen for creative reasons and to avoid repetition rather than the recent terror attacks in Europe.
Where theyre going to go next year is a little bit up in the air, Nevins told critics at the Television Critics Associations semi-annual press tour Monday. Were not necessarily going to stay [with addressing] U.S. relations in the Muslim world. The real franchise of the show is how difficult it is to be America in the world in the 21st century, how difficult the choices are. I think thats a story that will remain relevant for as long as they can come up with new stories. It could be Africa, it could be Europe, it could be back in another place in the Middle East. I dont expect that show to fall into a formula. I can see it coming back to the U.S. at some point.
Referencing the Charlie Hebdo shooting in France and North Koreas alleged hacking of Sony, Nevins noted that its a bit of a scary time to be a maker of controversial, political truth. Its been a bad month for free speech around the world.
Yet in terms of Homelandwhich is based on an Israeli format and has focused on Muslim extremists and Middle East terrorists since it launched in 2011the executive said that none of the current attacks will prevent the show from tackling sensitive international issues. I hope [the attacks are] not considered at all, he said. I really, really dont want there to be any limitations. I dont expect there will be. They never shied away from anything difficult. I want them to go right into the teeth of it again.
Homeland was criticized by officials in Pakistan and Israel for its most recent season. Pakistan officials complained about how their country was depicted as a war-torn hellhole that secretly helps terrorists, while Israel objected to a line of dialogue about a former Prime Minister.
I thought the Pakistani embassy handled it the way they were supposed to handle it, Nevins said. They made a statement through the press representing their side. Thats how the game is supposed to be played. It seems like the substance of their complaints is the U.S. and Pakistani [governments] have a very long and successful relationship and theyre united in the battle against terrorall of which are true. Some of the other sides [to Pakistan] the show brought up I think are also very defensible
Its a very well researched show. We spent a lot of time in Washington last year. Were going back to Washington in January. With that said, its a work of fiction. Im very defensive of their rights to tell difficult stories in difficult parts of the world. Natalie Abrams contributed to this report
"I-CAN-OVER-ACT -BETTER-THAN -YOOOOU!"
NOOOOO YOOOOOO CAAAAAANT!!!!
The show jumped the shark two seasons ago.
Never mind that they had a Marine Corps NCO running for VP. I’m sure the MSM would be okay with that. Ha!
Loved her in Firefly and Stargate.
Last night I saw one of these cups (which I suspect was going to be sold in theaters) at a store. On the bottom was stamped "MADE IN CHINA". Perhaps the hack was too.
Season one was absolutely top television. Season two slumped. Season three started very slow, then became intense. I haven’t noticed a willingness to back down from portraying Muslims as villains, or any squeamishness at all. If I were producing, I would indeed consider a direction change as the storyline played out.
Whatever. I’m saying that as a film person myself, you can only run the same story line so long. Villains wear out.
lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.