I may just misunderstand the map, but I can't see this...
Sure that screenshot doesn’t just correspond with higher temperatures because the heaviest co concentrations seem to be near the equator...
It would seem that despite the GW alarmist claims, it is not the US that is putting high levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.
fyi
“Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has no distinguishing features to show what its source was.”
OMG!! What an agenda killer statement! They always swear to God/gods/Gaia/satan that it’s all manmade and they need trillions of dollars from puking disgusting epic fail mankind to “fix” it!
Morons. Humans are definitely in epic fail mode, but it’s not because of naturally occurring gases on the planet.
With the exception of China, all of those areas seem to be either jungle, or Volcanic.
Imagine THAT ONE, eh??
This does not fit the pre-approved liberal echowhacko narrative!
Lookit all that CO2 over the Amazon Rainforest...welp, those darn trees are just gonna have to go! Tree-made Grobull Warming!
Especially to this one:
which is said to show Net Primary Production from 1951-2001.
As I understand it, NPP shows where most carbon dioxide is turned by photoynthesis into chemical energy.
To my completely layman eyes, it looks like the areas that the map you've shared here, matches this NPP map pretty well.
And that to me would seem to suggest a mechanism by which CO2 concentrates in the areas of the world where it does the most good.
I'm not an expert of any sort on this. I just notice this and wonder what is going on. I may be completely misunderstanding both maps.
rainforests cause global warming
CO2 is about 0.04% of the air, and most of that is produced in natural ways other than man’s activities.