Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

Even Apple’s lawyers said that they want to win this case on its merits, not procedural technicality.


10 posted on 12/09/2014 3:07:16 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise
Even Apple’s lawyers said that they want to win this case on its merits, not procedural technicality.

They have lots of merits to argue and the facts are wholly on their side. . .

But a Legal adversarial case can not and should NOT continue without a legitimate injured party plaintiff. There is a rule of law in this country that conservatives have to support. Apple's attorneys did not say that this was a mere "technicality." In fact they MADE THE MOTION TO DISMISS, Fool in P.

If they wanted to argue the case on its merits, they would not have made the motion. Get real.

13 posted on 12/09/2014 4:40:51 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson