The Turks fly updated Phantoms. A reconnaisance version got shot down over Syria in 2012. I love the saying about the Phantom if you have big enough engines you can make a brick fly. :)
1 posted on
12/05/2014 7:09:47 AM PST by
C19fan
To: C19fan
The F-4 (like the Warthog) proves that if you take care of a good piece of equipment it will last a long time.
But I wouldn’t want to fly an F-4 against an F-18 flown by our Marine pilots.
2 posted on
12/05/2014 7:12:05 AM PST by
rfreedom4u
(Do you know who Barry Soetoro is?)
To: C19fan
Maintenance pigs need love, too. LOTS of TLC.
/johnny
To: C19fan
4 posted on
12/05/2014 7:19:37 AM PST by
Red_Devil 232
((VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!))
To: C19fan
The first plane the could accelerate going straight up vertical on AB’s. (At least that is what my primary instructor told me).
5 posted on
12/05/2014 7:23:13 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: C19fan
The F-4 was designed to turn jet fuel into noise. Flight was an interesting and potentially useful side effect.
6 posted on
12/05/2014 7:23:23 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
To: C19fan
All they gotta do is a Smokey the Screamer F4 low 50 foot pass over ISIS. They`ll all be DEAF, permanentlty.
8 posted on
12/05/2014 7:25:14 AM PST by
bunkerhill7
(`("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione."))
To: C19fan
Had the aerodynamic characteristics of a pair of pliers.
9 posted on
12/05/2014 7:26:18 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: C19fan
The F-4 proves that if you strap a jet engine to anything it will fly.
11 posted on
12/05/2014 7:30:53 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: C19fan
Look at the B-52 that will probably still be flying in 2020
To: miele man
To: C19fan
It must be what you grow up with. They flew F-4s out of the Boise Air Port (Idaho ANG, Gowen Field). I grew up watching them. I have a distinct liking for them. It was the reason I went into the Air Force. I was going to be a jet engine mechanic, then made the very unwise decision, upon the concerned rhetoric of a MEPS paperwork pusher, to become a linguist (I'd taken German in high school, and they were looking for fodder, I guess).
Shoulda stuck with my original intent.
All of it stemmed from growing up around muscle cars. The F-4 and muscle cars were kissin' cousins in that theory of big engines and bricks.
20 posted on
12/05/2014 7:58:30 AM PST by
IYAS9YAS
(Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
To: C19fan; All
To: C19fan
Sierra Hotel!
37 posted on
12/05/2014 8:48:26 AM PST by
equaviator
(There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
To: C19fan
I asked the former chief pilot for NASA Dryden what his favorite plane was (he flew everything including the SR-71).
His answer... F4 Phantom. It was like the ultimate hotrod.
The last few years he headed the flight test group for the Eurofighter.
45 posted on
12/05/2014 8:58:40 AM PST by
BillM
(.)
To: C19fan
Military planes interest me, but I am not way into it. So I pose to you guys about the F4....I’ve seen all the comments about flying brick and all that....what tactical advantage does it bring? If it supposedly occasionally beat F-15s, why did that happen? With its apparent disadvantages, why did we use it and what was it built for to accomplish?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson