Well, maybe ABC's Modern Family TV show really sucked after all?....................
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Red Badger
Clearly, this is another sign of the approaching apocalypse...
2 posted on
10/10/2014 12:09:11 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: Red Badger
We were a neilson family once... once.
It was fun.
That was 15 years ago, and they’ve never asked us again...
3 posted on
10/10/2014 12:11:06 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: Red Badger
Does this mean “Longmire” will be reinstated?
4 posted on
10/10/2014 12:12:43 PM PDT by
Bratch
To: Red Badger
5 posted on
10/10/2014 12:13:35 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Red Badger
I love how they’re pretending a .05 error doesn’t matter. It didn’t when The Cosby Show got a 40.0. It matters a lot when plenty of shows are getting a 1.1 and a .05 difference could get them renewed — or cancelled.
6 posted on
10/10/2014 12:13:45 PM PDT by
Blue Ink
To: Red Badger
so its possibly MSNBC has less than 17 daily viewers?
9 posted on
10/10/2014 12:15:41 PM PDT by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: Red Badger
Are some Advertisers owed a refund? Should others be billed additionally?
12 posted on
10/10/2014 12:20:55 PM PDT by
YHAOS
To: Red Badger
Stole my thunder out of the gate.
What if nobody really was watching Modern Family?
13 posted on
10/10/2014 12:21:39 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
To: Red Badger
Easy to do the same with Presidential vote counts?
14 posted on
10/10/2014 12:21:51 PM PDT by
donna
(Pray for revival.)
To: Red Badger
I don’t understand why they can’t use cable company data. Surely the cable companies can tell who is watching what and when/
15 posted on
10/10/2014 12:25:34 PM PDT by
AdaGray
To: Red Badger
24 posted on
10/10/2014 1:23:51 PM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: Red Badger
With ad rates being predicated upon a stipulated audience that didn’t actually exist, will there be refunds?
25 posted on
10/10/2014 1:49:23 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: Red Badger
Sheesh, what simpletons.
I bet ABC got all the unidentified viewers, because ABC is alphabetically at the top of the network list.
I mean, they don’t know about Excel formulas or null values in SQL? Or auditing by another party for accuracy via a reconciliation process?
26 posted on
10/10/2014 2:13:33 PM PDT by
cicero2k
To: Red Badger
I’m waiting for the argument that anyone should be able to vote in Nielsen whether they register or not, and whether they show their ID or not.
To: Red Badger
CNN really had 10 viewers and not 5 as previously reported.
29 posted on
10/10/2014 2:43:58 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
To: Red Badger
Visions of the past two POTUS election votes.
30 posted on
10/10/2014 3:24:44 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Red Badger
The cable and ISP companies and satellite companies know exactly what shows are on. Why do they need Nielsen?
To: Red Badger
My last fulltime job, before I retired, was with Nielsen, except I wasn't in the TV ratings outfit.
I did work a lot with Dave Poltrack (mentioned in the article, a big CBS exec)... I had a lot of respect for the guy.
To: Red Badger
Who noticed? TV ratings these days are useless.
34 posted on
10/10/2014 4:25:38 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(Conservatives are all that's left to defend the Constitution. Dems hate it, and Repubs don't care.)
To: Red Badger
“Our entire industry relies upon Nielsen for accuracy and veracity... Monopoly
38 posted on
10/10/2014 11:09:44 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
