Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Nope; can’t have the jihad intarwebs suffering from clogged pipes.
1 posted on 10/09/2014 5:50:19 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

If you like your net neutrality, you can keep your net neutrality, unequivocally. - Barry Soetoro.


2 posted on 10/09/2014 5:54:01 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Got Ebola? Come to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
OBOLA sez he's 100 % committed to a free and open internet - translation: He'll do whatever he can with his pen and phone to shut it down.
3 posted on 10/09/2014 5:54:09 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Just another brand of redistribution.


4 posted on 10/09/2014 5:54:20 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I called Obama a slow learner in his first year in office and he’s done nothing to lose that label.

He’s had the world handed to him and knows absolutely nothing about political capital, proportionality, timing, etc.

He and his pie-in-the-sky speechwriters deal exclusively in superlatives: the best, the worst, the fastest, the most efficient, the most historic, etc. etc.

If they believe it they are fools. If they expect others to believe it then they know nothing about salesmanship since all the hype becomes an unintelligible din.

By now, even his most ardent supporters must recognize that any ‘reform’ he proposes is simply more government control by another name. The Net is ALREADY neutral. Getting a corrupt FCC involved would spell practical disaster.


5 posted on 10/09/2014 5:56:49 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Yeah whatever. Net “neutrality”, as espoused by the communist class (i.e. Democrats), means something entirely different than any sensible person would think.


6 posted on 10/09/2014 5:57:53 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Well, then he is stupid and doesnot understand the issue. How about he worries about archiving Federal emails first.


7 posted on 10/09/2014 5:58:16 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

When I read it. I read it like President Obama was for Net Neutrality. Thank God he is not. I cannot believe anybody would be for this disaster in the making. If this ever goes through.....anyone who votes for it I will personally try to get rid of them politically. This could be the worst thing ever to happen to the United States of America.


8 posted on 10/09/2014 5:58:19 PM PDT by napscoordinator (I guarantee every FRiend Misses the lost opportunity of a President Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Net neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers shouldn’t block, manipulate or slow data moving across their networks.

Makes no mention of government doing the same.

9 posted on 10/09/2014 5:58:55 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Obama Legacy: Bush's fault. Next guy's problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Once again hussein comes out as anti-business and in opposition to liberty. All I need to know is the wrong people support this “net neutrality” thing. If hussein is for it, I’m against it. Abolish the FCC! Get the government out of my internet! Allow free enterprise to run it!


10 posted on 10/09/2014 6:00:40 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Okay. That seals it. I am manifestly against it.


11 posted on 10/09/2014 6:01:56 PM PDT by rlmorel (The Media's Principles: Conflict must exist. Doesn't exist? Create it. Exists? Exacerbate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

A way to shut up Conservatives ....


12 posted on 10/09/2014 6:03:00 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

He’s lying. He’ll lie about it right up until the time they’re ready to spring their trap.


13 posted on 10/09/2014 6:03:18 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
How does "net neutrality" reduce Internet freedom?

This keeps getting lost in the debate.

22 posted on 10/09/2014 6:14:18 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Oh please FO, you liar

You guys are internationalizating control of the Internet to the UN.

They, are not interested in neutral anything.


29 posted on 10/09/2014 6:28:23 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai; All
OK

I'll be as kind as I can:

Anyone who believes Net Neutrality is good for them or the country...or Liberty...IS STUPID and/or NAIVE.

It's how the Federales will censor the internet. It's their nose in the tent.

ALL you need to know is Obama, the Dem Party (everyone)Google and Silicon Valley not only supports it, it's VERY high on their list.

Don't be STUPID Freeper.

31 posted on 10/09/2014 6:31:20 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
First, the phrase "net neutrality" should be abolished, since it has no objective meaning and is used to convey whatever wonderful or horrible concepts a particular speaker or writer wishes to convey.

In the instant application, the pResident wants the cost of a service to be severed from the market value of providing it. That's what he wants. It has nothing to do with neutrality, and in his core principles it really has nothing to do with the Internet, either, per se.

38 posted on 10/09/2014 7:41:32 PM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Well, you can’t have any better assurance than the promise of the president of the United States!


41 posted on 10/09/2014 8:07:22 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Every pie in the sky progressive commie idea will be implemented in such a way as to make it impossible to be undone by the time this idiot leaves office.


45 posted on 10/10/2014 4:43:02 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson