Skip to comments.
Autopsy question
vanity
Posted on 08/21/2014 10:30:59 AM PDT by airedale
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
08/21/2014 10:30:59 AM PDT
by
airedale
To: airedale
“far test”? What is that? Thank you.
2
posted on
08/21/2014 10:32:42 AM PDT
by
knittnmom
(Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
To: knittnmom
I believe he is referring to gunshot cartridge residue on the skin.
3
posted on
08/21/2014 10:36:50 AM PDT
by
House Atreides
(ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FOR CHILDERS 2014 .... Don't reward bad GOPe behavior.)
To: knittnmom
Firearm residue, I think?
4
posted on
08/21/2014 10:37:36 AM PDT
by
Boogieman
To: knittnmom
I'm wondering if English is his first language....
If so the claim the was no far by the Brown family team would be misleading at best.
5
posted on
08/21/2014 10:38:25 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: airedale
To: knittnmom
Meant GSR stupid auto correct which changed it when I hit enter to post. GSR = Gun Shot Residue
7
posted on
08/21/2014 10:41:09 AM PDT
by
airedale
To: airedale
Ah! Makes much more sense now! Thank you!
8
posted on
08/21/2014 10:41:53 AM PDT
by
knittnmom
(Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Sme times the connection from the brain to the fingers and then to teh kyeboard skps a little. Especially amongst us older folks. ;)
9
posted on
08/21/2014 10:42:32 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(Hillary or Warren 2016! Why? Just to have a woman for Historical Purpose?? That's Retarded Sir.)
To: Responsibility2nd
It is, but it’s not my pads first language and it has a tendency to change things when you hit enter if it thinks you spelled the word wrong.
10
posted on
08/21/2014 10:42:51 AM PDT
by
airedale
To: airedale
Even if superficial trace evidence is absent, a second autopsy can be expected to verify the number, placement, and track of the bullet wounds and may also yield samples for toxicology testing. Moreover, the pathologist conducting a second autopsy may obtain notes and test results from the first autopsy and integrate them into his analysis.
In this instance, the second autopsy doctor, Michael Baden, is a justly well-regarded pathologist and seems unlikely to risk his reputation by cooking up autopsy conclusions to satisfy the media or the Brown family.
To: Bringbackthedraft
lolol. Thanks for explaining. I thought maybe....
12
posted on
08/21/2014 10:47:01 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd; airedale
Ooops. Meant to post to you.
See? Even my computer went the wrong direction.
13
posted on
08/21/2014 10:48:32 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
Hey, that’s our cat you have in the photo!
14
posted on
08/21/2014 10:55:19 AM PDT
by
Bringbackthedraft
(Hillary or Warren 2016! Why? Just to have a woman for Historical Purpose?? That's Retarded Sir.)
To: airedale
Gunshot residue particles can be removed easily from the surfaces they land on. Regular activities, such as putting hands in pockets, rubbing hands together, or handling items, can wipe them away.4 The washing of hands can remove most, if not all, particles. Rates of loss vary widely with the activity of the subject. Depending on conditions and activity, particles may be removed from a shooters hands within 4 to 5 hours after a shooting event.5 They also can transfer from a surface or person to another individual; the amount depends on the number of GSR particles on the contaminated surface (e.g., a persons clothing or hands) and likely will be a small percentage of the total number of particles present.http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/may_2011/The%20Current%20Status%20of%20GSR%20Examinations
15
posted on
08/21/2014 11:04:14 AM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
To: Bringbackthedraft
Yeah? With them big paws (and claws)...
You better be nice to it.
16
posted on
08/21/2014 11:04:46 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: airedale
Are you talking about residue around Mike Brown’s wounds? Or about residue on Mike Brown’s hands?
If you’re talking about the wounds...
First, the lack of gunpowder residue works in favor of the policeman, because it shows that Mike Brown was not shot at close range, execution style.
Second, the body shots would leave residue on the clothes. And the clothes had better not have been washed.
If you’re talking about Mr Brown’s hands...
The lack of residue would indicate that Mr Brown’s hands were not on the gun when it fired. But as far as I know, no one is saying his hand was on the gun. It has been suggested that the gun fired while the two men were struggling, but that is not the same thing as saying that Mr Brown pulled the trigger. And we haven’t yet heard the policeman’s version of the events. At least not officially and in full.
To: Rockingham
According to testimony I’ve seen, Wilson’s sidearm discharged initially while he and Brown were struggling over it. Since Wilson was still in the cruiser at that point, the spent cartridge should still be in the vehicle as well.
But where did that bullet go? Did it strike Brown? Did the slide abrade Brown’s hand? Did the round strike inside the cruiser?
18
posted on
08/21/2014 11:36:31 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: knittnmom
far test? What is that? Thank you. I think he meant GSR. Gunshot residue.
19
posted on
08/21/2014 11:47:54 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(It is through will alone that I set my mind in motion.)
To: IronJack
I have wondered about that myself. If a bullet track can be established showing a weapon discharge inside the police cruiser, it would provide physical evidence backing Officer Wilson’s account.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson