[Morgana]

The answer is “YES” cater to them. Charge double and give the profits to a crisis pregnancy center!!!

[latina4dubya]

aye, aye, aye... what should they do? have each customer fill out an application before placing an order to ensure they only serve those who are prolife?

[Theo]

This isn’t the same thing as the baker who was asked to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.

In that case, the baker was being asked to essentially be part of their ceremony, blessing their event with a cake. In this case, CFA is simply providing lunch to individuals who are engaged in evil behavior.

They may seem the same to simple minds. But they are very different.

Good on CFA for serving these baby killers.

[sten]

ask the patients if they’d like lunch for one.. or two

hammer home they’re killing their kid

[lee martell]

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell!

[virgil283]

If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink : Proverbs 25:21

[Responsibility2nd]

To compare Chik fil a to Zyklon B Is beyond stupid. I personally would not cater to baby killers, but I would not go to the extreme level that this Pastor did.

[Aut Pax Aut Bellum]

They could just deliver a pile of scrambled eggs, or as my brother used to call them “chicken abortions”

[Salvation]

I’m wondering if the higher ups knew this. I doubt they would have approved it.

[MNDude]

I’ll prepare the food for them!

[usconservative]

Personally I'm very disappointed in Chik fil A for catering to the abortion clinic. Stood in line for HOURS a few years ago in support of Dan Cathy's pro-Marriage stance because I wanted to support a Christian owned company who's owners stood by their convictions.

Now I see it's ok to feed the "enemy" as some would call them, I call them murderers.

Very disappointing.

[jobim]

I must cite this in full for those who wish to follow the Catholic stance on cooperation with evil. CFA incurs no sin in delivering to the abortion murder mill, assuming interiorily the decision is made in accordance with the principles delineated below. However, we are all free to go beyond these parameters in avoidance of evil complicity, but not compelled to do so. We must be careful not to judge negatively those who choose not to go further in their avoidance of evil complicity.

Immediately the distinction between material cooperation and formal cooperation must be considered.

We are morally obligated never to give formal cooperation with an evil act, but under certain circumstances material cooperation with an immoral act may be tolerated.

MATERIAL COOPERATION IS ASSISTING IN ANOTHER'S WRONGDOING WITHOUT APPROVING IT. THE HELP GIVEN ASSISTS A PERSON TO PERFORM THE SINFUL ACTION, ALTHOUGH OF ITSELF THE HELP IS NOT WRONG. To provide necessary information to a thief, because one is forced to, would be material co-operation. Material cooperation with another person's evil action is allowed provided certain conditions are fulfilled.

SUCH COLLABORATION IS LICIT BECAUSE THE COOPERATOR DOES NOT INTERNALLY APPROVE OF THE SIN OF ANOTHER, NOR DOES HE OR SHE APPROVE OF THE SINFUL USE TO WHICH THE ASSISTANCE IS PUT BY THE OTHER.

The following principles are standard in resolving this complex moral issue:

Two kinds of material cooperation are to be distinguished: immediate and mediate.

In immediate material cooperation, one person actually does something morally wrong with another person. Thus if a surgeon and an assistant are both enganged in actually aborting a fetus, the cooperation of the assistant is immediate.

IMMEDIATE MATERIAL COOPERATION IN THE SINFUL ACT OF ANOTHER IS ALWAYS WRONG. It is pointless to say that a person who is not under duress performs a criminal action without intending to do so.

Mediate material cooperation is concurring in the wrong action of another, but not in such a way that one actually performs the act with the other.

While doing something that is in itself good or indifferent, a person rather gives an occasion to another's sin, or contributes something by way of assistance.

The morality of mediate material cooperation is to be judged on the principle of double effect.

In applying this principle there are four basic norms to be observed. Among these norms is THE OBLIGATION NOT TO INTEND THE EVIL EFFECT (as would really be intended in immediate material cooperation) and the NEED FOR SUFFICIENT REASON TO PERMIT THE EVIL EFFECT.

FORMAL COOPERATION is the deliberate concurrence in another person's sinful action.

The cooperation is formal and always sinful if, besides giving external help of whatever kind, one interiorly wants the evil action to be performed.

https://www.ewtn.com/library/ISSUES/TAXES.TXT

[TBP]

No. Starve them.

[VerySadAmerican]

Sadly no one at the clinic is breaking the law. So, yes, sell to them.

[trebb]

Sigh - a priest “activist” (writing letters is the next best thing to inaction). He may be justifiably outraged, but I side with the business on this one. I find it interesting that the baby-killing folks aren’t boycotting Chik-Fil-A.
Perhaps the priest would do better by holding prayer meetings outside the abortion place instead of writing scathing letters...

[Caipirabob]

Why not work it into the menu and sell “aborted chicken sandwiches”...crikey...does the left ever get tired of playing with dead babies?!? What a great lot of ghouls...