“This woman .... is never consistent.”
Yes she is. She is consistently ambitious, and it is all about her. She’s always been driven by her personal ambition to ‘be important’. I strongly believe that if given the opportunity to have her ‘ideological’ platform enacted in the US, but that she would never be given any credit for it or be associated with it in any way, it would not be acceptable to her.
In that dimension, she certainly is consistent; but her rhetoric never is.