“I think it’s imperative that the government of the USA, currently led by Obama, be much more inclusive, much more willing to share power, involve all the different segments of America,” she said on CNN.
Democrats/Obama wouldn't do it here, why does Hillary think Maliki would do it in Iraq?
“Clinton said al-Maliki showed weak leadership by exhibiting a preference for Iraqi Shi‘ites”
The Sunni minority should always be in the Iraqi drivers seat I guess. 70% of Iraq is Shiite. It seems logical that they would have the biggest voice.
But whatever, Hillary,, oh my God,, would you please freakin’ shut the F up.
We Americans do not have that right under Obama to go around pointing fingers, saying this or that ‘country’s leader should go’. We have too many problems in our own back yard, starting with Obama’s habit of making decisions that needlessly damage his own country. The Egyptians of today would be quick to point at Obama as a supporter and financer of mid-eastern terrorism. They feel Obama ‘should go’, as do I.
Maliki must be standing in the way of the Caliphate.
I see the Dems have figured out the latest version of the video that caused Benghazi.
No matter who had been in the civil government, AQ in its latest incarnation as ISIS would have attacked them. This isn’t political and it isn’t even “sectarian;” it’s about Islamic conquest and the annihilation of civil government.
And replace him with whom?
One would think that the former Secretary of State would have engineered that for which she is now calling.
As far as actual accomplishments as SoS, this should have been a rather simple task.
sounds like huma wrote her talking points on behalf of the so-inclusive Saudi government
I thought she was merely a private citizen now. But all of a sudden, she wants to act like a Secretary of State, after occupying that office for four years and doing nothing but log air-miles.