Why would a home run be holding a baby?
To: nickcarraway
It was a great catch nonetheless.
2 posted on
06/16/2014 6:26:48 PM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: nickcarraway
Aaron Hernandez Due in Court to Seek Dismissal of Charge Charged no doubt with CBWMWHB. (Catching Ball Without Mitt While Holding Baby).
3 posted on
06/16/2014 6:27:13 PM PDT by
PapaNew
To: nickcarraway
A bad bounce and that could have been baby’s last.
4 posted on
06/16/2014 6:27:47 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: nickcarraway
6 posted on
06/16/2014 6:33:37 PM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
( Laughter is the best medicine, unless you have diarrhea.)
To: nickcarraway
It was hit by Tulowitzki.
Tull wanted the ball because it was fathers day and he wanted to save a Father’s Day home run ball he hit.
So the guy gave it to him and Tulo gave him an autographed ball.
7 posted on
06/16/2014 6:33:42 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
To: nickcarraway
8 posted on
06/16/2014 6:34:01 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: nickcarraway
Why would a home run be holding a baby?And why would they drag Aaron Hernandez into court over this? He's getting blamed for more things than George Bush lately.
To: nickcarraway
11 posted on
06/16/2014 6:37:12 PM PDT by
rsobin
To: nickcarraway
No Mitt (Romney), no problem.
To: nickcarraway
18 posted on
06/16/2014 7:00:29 PM PDT by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: nickcarraway
No, the fan caught the baby who was holding the home run.
21 posted on
06/16/2014 7:20:40 PM PDT by
Excellence
(Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
To: nickcarraway
You know at first I thought it was a story about the GOP doing without Romney, I must say I was disappointed as I kept reading.
22 posted on
06/16/2014 7:51:37 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: nickcarraway
“Journalists” do seem to have grammar problems these days.
Plainly the headline writer meant ...Fan Holding Baby Catches Home Run..., since what he wrote glosses as you had it, that the home run was holding a baby, or (I’m not sure whether more or less absurdly) that the fan caught a baby who was holding a home run (reading the present participle having home run as its object and functioning as an adjective).
24 posted on
06/16/2014 8:33:27 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: nickcarraway
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson