‘No evidence for or against gravitational waves’: Big Bang 'ripples' too weak to be significant.

NATURE ^ | 06/02/2014 | RON COWEN

[HandyDandy]

I think where we agree is that the existence of a Big Bang does not necessarily imply that a “god” is required.

Further, I think we agree that the “potentials”, for the formation of everything that exists, always existed. Or, more precisely, that the “potentials” at least preceded the formation.

[DannyTN]

"But the next time you need a new light bulb, call a priest, minister, rabbi or monk. They should be able to talk one into existence though pure sophistry.

None of them created life and they can't talk light bulbs into existence, any more than evolution can produce one.

Just look at the gyrations this evolutionist has to go through to explain the lowly fire fly. And then he ends up admitting that they can't reproduce it. Must have been a "random accident" that someone repeated itself until it was selected for. ROFLMAO

Seriously. A rabbi has a better chance of talking a light bulb into existence than evolution creating one.

[DannyTN]

Evo non-explanation of the firefly

[freedumb2003]

Not being able to explain something does not mean it isn’t natural. There is a heck of a lot of things science is still working through. And, of course, you still can’t plug ID into a wall socket.

The Theory of Gravity is one of the least understood (and most explored) areas of scientific study. But we see its effects.

Your strawman fails (as have all your previous ones).

[DannyTN]

"And, of course, you still can’t plug ID into a wall socket."

I beg to differ. The light bulb was intelligently designed and is pluggable into a wall socket. It was intelligently designed by man.

You are surrounded by intelligent design. You drive a vehicle built by intelligent design, and type on a computer that was built by intelligent design.

A single cell is far more advanced than any of that, but you refuse to recognize it was designed. You need to put yourself under the microscope.