Skip to comments.
ExxonMobil votes against expanding pro-homosexual employment policy for the 17th time
lifesitenews.com ^
| 05/31/2014
| KIRSTEN ANDERSEN
Posted on 05/31/2014 6:40:21 PM PDT by massmike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: left that other site
21
posted on
05/31/2014 8:29:20 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(America needs more real Americans.)
To: massmike
This is one reason why I always shop at Exxon Mobile if I have a choice (in the area)!!!!
22
posted on
05/31/2014 8:47:24 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: massmike
What are the “openly gay” homosexuals going to do? Boycott them? ROTFL! Sexual deviants are sickos.
23
posted on
05/31/2014 8:49:21 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: massmike
DiNapoli is like Cuomo. They just can’t stand to have those evil free enterprise type organizations in New York. Gotta find a way to ‘encourage’ them to get outta da state!
24
posted on
05/31/2014 9:04:16 PM PDT
by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: massmike
“The company has also offered full benefits to legally “married” same-sex couples since the Supreme Court struck down key provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 2012.”
Exxon has already given in to the homosexual activists and give benefits to the gays and their lovers.
To: massmike
...called on Barack Obama to issue an executive order forcing the company to comply with their demands. Huh?!?
-PJ
26
posted on
05/31/2014 9:57:56 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: massmike
...or mental disability, ...
***********************************
Yep. Already covered.
It’s becoming beyond tiresome to see the constant pushing for special status by the LGBT crowd.
27
posted on
05/31/2014 10:03:46 PM PDT
by
octex
To: massmike
“But homosexual activists say it’s not enough”
Isn’t that kind of what they always say?
28
posted on
05/31/2014 10:21:25 PM PDT
by
DemforBush
(A repo man is always intense.)
To: massmike
" . . . will be evaluated without regard to “race, color, sex, religion, national origin, citizenship status, age, genetic information, physical or mental disability, veteran or other legally protected status.”
So they will hire a mentally disabled person to be their corporate spokesperson, and a physically disabled person to perform complex physical tasks?
To: massmike
They’re covered already under the “mental disability” protection.
To: massmike
he can’t write a lawful eo against a private company. eo’s are only for executive agenices.
31
posted on
05/31/2014 10:58:38 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: massmike
Some gay activists have called on Barack Obama to issue an executive order forcing the company to comply with their demands. Whaaaaaat???
I had no idea that oil companies were part of the executive branch of government.
32
posted on
06/01/2014 12:46:26 AM PDT
by
Washi
To: massmike
Shite
I’ll buy more Tony this week for sure.
Go Exxon.
Are any of the Blaffers still kicking?
Only old Texas folks will understand that...
33
posted on
06/01/2014 1:07:53 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(we will not take back our way of life through peaceful means.....i have 5 kids....i fear for them)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson