Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State trooper convicted of official oppression for illegal searches
click2houston ^ | : May 24 2014 | AP

Posted on 05/25/2014 10:27:43 AM PDT by eastforker

A former Texas Department of Public Safety trooper has been sentenced to probation after pleading guilty to performing illegal body cavity searches on two women last July along a Dallas-area highway

(Excerpt) Read more at click2houston.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: cavitysearch; donutwatch; dps; texas
A 2000 dollar fine and 2 years probation. She was fired but is appealing that.
1 posted on 05/25/2014 10:27:43 AM PDT by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eastforker

It’s probably wrong to generalize about such a huge state, but Texas seems to actually be punishing some bad cops and prosecutors lately.


2 posted on 05/25/2014 11:03:58 AM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Peace On Earth! Purity of Essence! McCain/Ripper 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker; Alaska Wolf; TexasFreeper2009; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; ...
JBT Ping list


3 posted on 05/25/2014 11:47:18 AM PDT by null and void (When was the last time you heard anyone say: "It's a free country"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
Helleson was subsequently fired but is appealing.

SMART-*SS RESPONSE: No, she's not appealing at all.

SERIOUS RESPONSE: She's convicted of official oppression but could still keep her job? What the **** does it take to lose a LEO license in Texas?!

4 posted on 05/25/2014 11:56:36 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

Don’t know if official oppression is a felony, or not, but it still has an effect on her ability to hold a law enforcement position. Derogatory background information is a juicy target for defense lawyers.


5 posted on 05/25/2014 12:03:25 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

No, that particular charge can only be charged as a Class A misdemeanor. That said, if there was another crime done in concert with that crime, such as certain assaults or bribery or graft, then the other crime could be charged as a felony. But the crime you named on it’s own, cannot. You can see the statute at: http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/39.03.00.html


6 posted on 05/25/2014 12:06:24 PM PDT by Sporke (USS Iowa BB-61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

In a cop-related website, Jim Glenning, a career cop and owner of the Street Survival Seminar, defended the actions of cops in an Albuquerque shooting, and used that one defense as a basis to conclude that the perception of cops as abusive or as killers was totally false.

He was asked to review all such reported abusive incidents in the last few years, and then draw a conclusion.

He is invited to add this to his review, if he ever decides to do it.


7 posted on 05/25/2014 12:33:50 PM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Considering the fact that she didn’t change gloves between “searching” the two victims, a suit for medical malpractice while practicing medicine without a license might be in order.


8 posted on 05/25/2014 12:35:19 PM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

Oh, I am sure there is going to be a huge lawsuit associated with this. If this idiot ex-trooper has professional liability insurance I am sure they are looking to cut a check and not go to court.


9 posted on 05/25/2014 12:42:02 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

No kidding. I thought Texas was supposed to be so great. Its slipping.


10 posted on 05/25/2014 1:35:32 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

Case again for ‘street justice’.


11 posted on 05/25/2014 3:27:40 PM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (Had ENOUGH Yet ? ........................ Enforce the Bill of Rights ......... It's the LAW !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

12 posted on 05/27/2014 9:51:49 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Thanks for the ping


13 posted on 05/27/2014 10:02:48 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments
Yes...but in my opinion, there are still way too many cases of official oppression.

Cops are too hyper-vigilant. Everyone is a suspect, everyone poses a threat to them.

This mindset is leading to these abuses. Folks are getting hurt/killed at the hands of those who are supposed to protect them.

Police forces around the nation are looking more like paramilitary rather than cops.

14 posted on 05/28/2014 6:07:32 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sporke

Wait.....the state made a law against oppressing citizens with government authority and it’s A MISDEMEANOR??!

That shouldn’t even be a felony, it should be a special class of super-felony subject to capital punishment, shunning of all your relatives, your house gets converted into a public restroom and any mention of you is expunged from history.


15 posted on 05/28/2014 7:14:03 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Forgotten Amendments

Any person acting with the authority of the State needs to be held personally accountable for malfeasance or abuse of that power.

They need to be personally civilly liable to anyone they violate.
And, actually, they should be required to obtain malfeasance insurance from a private insurer, who sets individual rates based on risk. That way, it becomes too expensive for a crooked gov’t agent to remain employed as such.


16 posted on 05/28/2014 7:17:38 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Our plans (see below your post) would make it less attractive for people to pursue gov’t jobs....

good.


17 posted on 05/28/2014 7:18:49 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I completely agree! Our laws are so screwed up. It’s time for the roaches to take over the world, because we don’t have what it takes. :-/


18 posted on 05/28/2014 7:32:56 AM PDT by Sporke (USS Iowa BB-61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Onoz! We have so few goobermint employees as it is.....oh, wait.....

(Just agreeing with you in a sarcastic Gabon)


19 posted on 05/28/2014 7:57:05 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson