Skip to comments.
NEW REPORT: More Than 1 Million Kids Have Stopped Eating Michelle Obama’s “Healthy” School Lunches…
Rightwing News ^
| May 24, 2014
| Tiffiny Ruegner
Posted on 05/24/2014 4:21:19 PM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
the first manlady is a 'loser' all right.
1
posted on
05/24/2014 4:21:19 PM PDT
by
kingattax
To: kingattax
More than a million kids confronted by healthier school lunches are turning up their noses, leaving the cafeteria and heading out to get a burger instead. And yet they're so poor we have to subsidize their lunches?
2
posted on
05/24/2014 4:23:15 PM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: kingattax
Michelle Obamas new dietary restrictions is so bad that they cant even GIVE the food away. They is?
3
posted on
05/24/2014 4:27:39 PM PDT
by
Hugin
To: kingattax
Wait a minute. We've now learned that fat is NOT bad for you. Ancel Keyes was a fraud.
4
posted on
05/24/2014 4:27:58 PM PDT
by
JoeFromSidney
(Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
To: kingattax
The government never learns that legislation does not change behavior. Prohibition should have convinced these morons.
5
posted on
05/24/2014 4:33:44 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: ConservingFreedom
Follow the money. The free lunch program is a gigantic scam.
6
posted on
05/24/2014 4:35:46 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: kingattax
Where in the United States Constitution does a give the first lady the power to dictate school lunches?
To: kingattax
Who put this ignorant obese POS in charge of local districts school lunches?
Does no one stand up to these people?
(Except the children that is)
To: Hugin
They could give it to the hog farmers and see if they would eat it. ‘If’ they do then the farmers can butcher the hog and give it back to the schools and they can make bacon or ham sandwiches for the kids. Everybody will be happy, even Michelle.
9
posted on
05/24/2014 4:58:11 PM PDT
by
Vinylly
(?%)
To: shalom aleichem
More Than 1 Million Kids Have Stopped Eating Michelle Obamas Healthy School Lunches
Democrats will spin this as a positive.
Kids eating less, means fewer kids obese or fat.
Michelle's plan for more healthy kids is a smashing success.
10
posted on
05/24/2014 4:59:14 PM PDT
by
adorno
(Y)
To: shalom aleichem
re: who's in charge
It's possible to put together a healthy lunch that the kids will eat. I've seen some schools do it. The parents and students should stop whining and work with the schools to get better food selections.
11
posted on
05/24/2014 5:02:00 PM PDT
by
grania
To: kingattax
No problemo.
Just lock the schools down from 8 AM to 3 PM. No one allowed in or out. Just like a prison.
That way they will have to eat Moochelle's slop, or go without.
12
posted on
05/24/2014 5:14:12 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: kingattax
We just need to find a way to keep the kids from leaving school for lunch.
13
posted on
05/24/2014 5:20:06 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
To: Oliviaforever; All
" Where in the United States Constitution does a give the first lady the power to dictate school lunches?" That's a good question Oliviaforever. And the answer is that it doesn't.
In fact, the Supreme Court has officially clarified that the Constitution's silence about any issue, school lunches for intrastate schools in this example, means that the federal government is prohibited from interefering with such things.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"That way they will have to eat Moochelle's slop, or go without."
What then when they still do not eat the "healthy" lunches?
15
posted on
05/24/2014 5:25:16 PM PDT
by
JSteff
(It was ALL about SCOTUS.. We are DOOMED for several generations. . Who cares? Dem's did and voted!)
To: kingattax
If it was really that good Moo would have the exact same daily menus at the White House table and cafeteria...but none of the big cheese are going to eat that crap .... that’s for the little people.
16
posted on
05/24/2014 5:48:46 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(If you lined up the best and brightest of this administration, you'd just have a string of dim bulbs)
To: RetiredTexasVet
If it was really that good Moo would have the exact same daily menus at the White House table and cafeteria...but none of the big cheese are going to eat that crap .... thats for the little people. Expecting anybody named Obama to eat ObamaDiet is like expecting anybody named to Obama to be covered under Obamacare. Now, if they renamed it WookieCare...
17
posted on
05/24/2014 6:01:07 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(The Road To Hell is not paved with good results.)
To: shalom aleichem
The Revealed Dietary Wisdom of the illustious St. Steatopygia is correctly seen by the kids as ‘reviled’, and forget the wisdom.
“Youth has a built in BS detector”.
18
posted on
05/24/2014 7:36:48 PM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(Islam Delenda Est - because of what Islam is and because of what Muslims do.)
To: kingattax
Forcing kids to eat what the Sasquatch has decided, is not a problem in the slightest for a totalitarian politico/social regime. Just
force them to eat.
Unfortunately, the "fundamental transformation" of the U.S. is not yet complete, and bothersome legal impediments, like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights prevents that option --- thus far.
That is just a temporary roadbump in the path to the "equitable" ideal society, as presently envisioned by the African Contingent. You know, from that continent with the wholesale number of Nobel Laureates?
So what will be the outcome of this conundrum be for the millions of students nationwide who are helpless to do anything other than eat elsewhere?
That remains to be seen. But little setbacks like this one does not discourage the totalitarians. They are nothing if not determined. It's for their own good. Doesn't matter. The end justifies the means; the everlasting mantra of the totalitarian bent. They know its good.
Lost in the drama is the fact that part of the force-feed program is the total absence of any monitoring whatsoever of the thousands of tons of wasted food (and money) each month that the ill-conceived force-feed continues.
I suppose it is possible that all those millions of obstinate students are simply racist.
19
posted on
05/24/2014 7:52:45 PM PDT
by
publius911
( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
To: kingattax
Then the size of her butt would suggest that she ate what they didn’t.
20
posted on
05/24/2014 7:58:22 PM PDT
by
laweeks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson