the first manlady is a 'loser' all right.
1 posted on
05/24/2014 4:21:19 PM PDT by
kingattax
To: kingattax
More than a million kids confronted by healthier school lunches are turning up their noses, leaving the cafeteria and heading out to get a burger instead. And yet they're so poor we have to subsidize their lunches?
2 posted on
05/24/2014 4:23:15 PM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: kingattax
Michelle Obamas new dietary restrictions is so bad that they cant even GIVE the food away. They is?
3 posted on
05/24/2014 4:27:39 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: kingattax
Wait a minute. We've now learned that fat is NOT bad for you. Ancel Keyes was a fraud.
4 posted on
05/24/2014 4:27:58 PM PDT by
JoeFromSidney
(Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
To: kingattax
The government never learns that legislation does not change behavior. Prohibition should have convinced these morons.
5 posted on
05/24/2014 4:33:44 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: kingattax
Where in the United States Constitution does a give the first lady the power to dictate school lunches?
To: kingattax
Who put this ignorant obese POS in charge of local districts school lunches?
Does no one stand up to these people?
(Except the children that is)
To: kingattax
No problemo.
Just lock the schools down from 8 AM to 3 PM. No one allowed in or out. Just like a prison.
That way they will have to eat Moochelle's slop, or go without.
12 posted on
05/24/2014 5:14:12 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: kingattax
We just need to find a way to keep the kids from leaving school for lunch.
13 posted on
05/24/2014 5:20:06 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
To: kingattax
If it was really that good Moo would have the exact same daily menus at the White House table and cafeteria...but none of the big cheese are going to eat that crap .... that’s for the little people.
16 posted on
05/24/2014 5:48:46 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(If you lined up the best and brightest of this administration, you'd just have a string of dim bulbs)
To: kingattax
Forcing kids to eat what the Sasquatch has decided, is not a problem in the slightest for a totalitarian politico/social regime. Just
force them to eat.
Unfortunately, the "fundamental transformation" of the U.S. is not yet complete, and bothersome legal impediments, like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights prevents that option --- thus far.
That is just a temporary roadbump in the path to the "equitable" ideal society, as presently envisioned by the African Contingent. You know, from that continent with the wholesale number of Nobel Laureates?
So what will be the outcome of this conundrum be for the millions of students nationwide who are helpless to do anything other than eat elsewhere?
That remains to be seen. But little setbacks like this one does not discourage the totalitarians. They are nothing if not determined. It's for their own good. Doesn't matter. The end justifies the means; the everlasting mantra of the totalitarian bent. They know its good.
Lost in the drama is the fact that part of the force-feed program is the total absence of any monitoring whatsoever of the thousands of tons of wasted food (and money) each month that the ill-conceived force-feed continues.
I suppose it is possible that all those millions of obstinate students are simply racist.
19 posted on
05/24/2014 7:52:45 PM PDT by
publius911
( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
To: kingattax
Then the size of her butt would suggest that she ate what they didn’t.
20 posted on
05/24/2014 7:58:22 PM PDT by
laweeks
To: kingattax
One million racist American kids.....who knew?
24 posted on
05/24/2014 8:10:11 PM PDT by
woofie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson