To: nycteacher
There’s a link to their picture (in the Post Article).
To: nycteacher; GeronL
Protected "class"
3 posted on
03/21/2014 5:05:41 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: nycteacher
“The penalty of termination is shockingly disproportionate,” said the ruling, which noted that “engagement in what appeared to be consensual sexual conduct with an adult colleague is not in and of itself criminal or otherwise improper.”Paging George Constanza, Mister George Costanza...
4 posted on
03/21/2014 5:05:48 AM PDT by
Quality_Not_Quantity
(Liars use facts when the truth doesn't suit their purposes.)
To: nycteacher
I tried to find some crazy justification for this insanity... then I realized. They’re lezbos. INSTANT SPECIAL TREATMENT! Pass Go! Collect your hate crime remunerations!
5 posted on
03/21/2014 5:06:40 AM PDT by
Viennacon
To: nycteacher
There was a time when a teacher could be fired for smoking at home or dating an eligible bachelor. The pendulum has swung the other way now and they probably can’t be fired for smoking crack or staring in porn flicks with animals.
According to liberalism, there is no God. Therefore there can be no morals as to establish them implies one morality is better than the other. Since there is no God there can’t be a superior or overarching morality. So, for right now, only the things I know are immoral are illegal. (But that is an ever changing standard and each liberal’s standard is different.)
To: nycteacher
would the ruling be the same is the sex was between man and woman??
or do we have a judge playing into the promotion of gayness?
as is the government, schools, etc.??
8 posted on
03/21/2014 5:08:32 AM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: nycteacher; Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows; GeronL; Daffynition
“The penalty of termination is shockingly disproportionate,” said the ruling, which noted that “engagement in what appeared to be consensual sexual conduct with an adult colleague is not in and of itself criminal or otherwise improper.”"Was that somehow wrong? If someone had let me know that was the policy here...." < /Costanza >
9 posted on
03/21/2014 5:09:19 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The Texas judge's decision was to pave the way for same sex divorce for two Massachusetts women.)
To: nycteacher
Had either one of them been a male there would have been a very different ruling.
10 posted on
03/21/2014 5:21:39 AM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: nycteacher; Lazamataz
Paging Laz
11 posted on
03/21/2014 5:30:38 AM PDT by
JRios1968
(I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
To: nycteacher
kids can’t pray on “govt property” but homosexuals can play
12 posted on
03/21/2014 5:37:25 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: nycteacher
For the record, I am personally sick of the dumbing down of our language, there is no such thing as gay “sex”.. what these two committed was Sodomy, period.
There is no such thing as homosexual sex, just as there is no such thing as anal or oral sex.... These acts do not and cannot lead to procreation so they are not sex, they are sodomy, period.
To: nycteacher
41 posted on
03/21/2014 1:22:05 PM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: nycteacher
What happened to the old saying? “Don’t sleep where you work. Don’t bleep where you eat!”
43 posted on
03/21/2014 1:29:03 PM PDT by
Darren McCarty
(Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
To: metmom; wintertime
Another day, another "Naughty Teacher" posting. Nothing to see here
48 posted on
03/22/2014 2:09:07 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
To: metmom; wintertime; JenB
There were no students in the room at the time, but they still could have gotten a room.
51 posted on
04/18/2014 2:13:11 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
To: nycteacher
me yet, the college teacher who wore a T shirt with patriotic language on it got fired....
To: nycteacher
The courts have over-reached.
55 posted on
04/18/2014 2:25:17 PM PDT by
tioga
To: nycteacher
Stupid Judge. The behavior outside the school might no be criminal, but it certainly doesn’t belong in public - especially doesn’t belong in the school room.
Any one with half a brain would know that is a firing offense. Anybody know if their contract has a moral’s clause?
56 posted on
04/18/2014 2:30:49 PM PDT by
greeneyes
(Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
