Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote Buying Bill Advances on Party-Line Vote from House Elections Committee
Minnesota Majority ^ | 2-26-14 | Dan McGrath

Posted on 02/26/2014 5:34:37 AM PST by TurboZamboni

Minnesota Statutes 204C.18 and 204C.22 contain protections against vote buying fraud that have been in place in some form through court rulings and statutes as long as Minnesota has had a secret or “Australian” ballot, which was adopted statewide in 1891 with strong bipartisan support.

Prior to the advent of the Australian ballot system, scholars and historians note that vote buying corruption was common practice, but voters would generally need to provide evidence that they have voted the “right” way to collect their bounty, typically ranging from $2 to $20 in those days.

The proof could often be a mark on a ballot that identified who had cast it, or the act of showing one’s completed ballot to the right person before depositing it in the ballot box. Making small tears in a ballot was also a common practice.

Prohibiting and invalidating ballots containing identifying marks has been a deterrent to vote buying fraud that’s helped protect the sanctity of the secret ballot for over 120 years. Now, HF1841 (Freiberg – D- 45B) and its companion bill in the senate (SF1663, Hoffman – D-36) would strip away that anti-fraud protection by making it legal for voters to make self-identifying marks on a ballot and requiring such marked ballots to be accepted and tabulated.

(Excerpt) Read more at minnesotamajority.org ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; franken; mn; votefraud; voterfraud; voting
HF1841 was heard in the House Elections Committee on the first day of session and was passed to the full House on a party-line vote with all Democrats on the committee voting in favor and all Republicans voting no.
1 posted on 02/26/2014 5:34:37 AM PST by TurboZamboni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Or Democrats can simply keep recounting bogus votes until their candidate wins, as in the case of the clown currently representing them in the Senate.


2 posted on 02/26/2014 5:40:00 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I wonder if instead getting 2 dollars or 20 dollars for voting the right way, the democrats will adopt the new technologies of smart phones to their scheme.

For example, instead of offering money, they could have a live video feed of two thugs with guns pointed at the wife and kids for a suitable incentive to vote the right way.


3 posted on 02/26/2014 7:29:01 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson