I don’t understand how this can be mocked.
We’re being asked to believe that a “rock” just “popped up.”
Or that a “rock” “blew in” in an atmosphere so thin that it would have a hard time moving a daisy petal.
Or the “something” made the rock “fall down” without bouncing, impacting or leaving a dust trail.
In other words, we’re being asked to believe absurdities by NASA, and when someone points out that this thing is a close imitation to a fungus that not only looks like it, but acts like it, HE’s a nut?
No.
Concur. If NASA has elected not to investigate this rock then how can anyone so readily dismiss the possibility that it is not a rock at all?
It's a change of lighting... easily understood. . . and can be seen by modifying the pictures with Photoshop.