Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Night vision scope "generations" ???

Posted on 12/13/2013 7:12:21 AM PST by varmintman

Could anybody here explain the thing about generations of night vision scopes for me, and why is anybody still producing a gen-1 scope? I've moved into an area in which hog hunting is plausible and any info would be appreciated.


TOPICS: Outdoors
KEYWORDS: banglist; hogs; hunting; nightvision

1 posted on 12/13/2013 7:12:21 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Cost would be my guess. Sort of like why produce a Mossberg 500 when there are Benelli’s available?


2 posted on 12/13/2013 7:14:04 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
Here's a good write up on it.
3 posted on 12/13/2013 7:17:19 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

I believe the numbers refer to the quality of the image resolution. The higher the number, the clearer the image will be. There are improvements with each generation that enable this, but as you may have noticed, the price goes up as well.


4 posted on 12/13/2013 7:20:09 AM PST by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
The difference will be the relative ability to amplify ambient light.

Gen 1 requires moonlight for the most part.

Gen 2 can hack it in mean starlight, but is subject to gaining down the whole tube for a bright light source.

Gen 3 starts to get into tubes with better discrimination of bright light sources. About 20/25 for visual acuity.

5 posted on 12/13/2013 7:26:23 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Gen 1 is like using the bottom of old coke bottles as glasses. If you are serious spend the money on gen 2 or 3.


6 posted on 12/13/2013 7:26:36 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
This might help.


7 posted on 12/13/2013 7:32:23 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature ($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I have a friend that works for a company which is fielding testing a new digital goggle. It is supposed to have 80% better discrimination of light sources in the field of view. It will also have a “wifi” capability to transmit the streaming image to a network, or to upload other imagery to the tube. In testing now with the military.


8 posted on 12/13/2013 7:33:14 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Thanx for the link. Now I know where the little monocular I purchased recently fits in the technology development process. The IR needs no battery, just a couple of pumps on a ‘bellows’. It has an IR light attached which does use a AA battery, but I seldom turn it on. Practicing navigating through the house in pitch dark has been a fun exercise I hope I never have to use ...


9 posted on 12/13/2013 7:44:29 AM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Google is your friend....


10 posted on 12/13/2013 8:13:42 AM PST by JParris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

https://archive.org/details/gov.archives.li.263.2338


11 posted on 12/13/2013 8:16:45 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
My question is, are they getting any lighter? Those early models turned me off because you'd have to have a stationary position with something like this.

I have his big brother, the magnum field pod. It's a lot of gear to have to tote into the field.

12 posted on 12/13/2013 8:24:49 AM PST by LouAvul (In a state of disbelief as to how liberals destroyed America in a mere 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Please get me one (or five) for field testing. I'd be glad to test them out for him.
Please Please Pretty Please
13 posted on 12/13/2013 8:50:05 AM PST by LivingNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LivingNet

Get in line.


14 posted on 12/13/2013 8:56:54 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature; varmintman

You will see many black/white “digital” viewers for low prices, sometimes advertised as “generation 2.5”. These are OK but nowhere near as good as generation 3 or 4 in the green analog tube viewers. Gen 4 is going to cost you buck$.


15 posted on 12/13/2013 10:04:02 AM PST by Sender (It's never too late to be what you might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson