How can you break a law but not be considered a criminal?
How does that work???
Something tells me O’Reilly would not feel the same if someone burglarized his house!
He would not say that was a civil matter would he????
Haven’t watched him in years, and even then it was rare for me to watch. Can’t imagine why anyone would invest an hour a day with him
I wrote this clown off when he started whimpering about “big oil profits” the guy obviously does not research his subject matter at all.
How about identity theft?
Is that still a crime?
Obama is using STOLEN SSN #042-68-4425.
It was issued to a Connecticut resident. Obama never lived there.
To get his murder case dropped, Zimmerman should’ve started using Obama’s stolen SSN.
What could they do, sue/prosecute Zimmerman for using it? His lawyers would show up in court to document “The history of this SSN,” and suddenly Obamatollah and Capo Holder would make the case “go away.”
It shocks me that we have an Islamocommunist regime prancing around using forged documents and committing identity theft, yet nobody in a nation of 300 Million people has the balls to point it out (other than Arpaio/Zullo).
O really lost the last of his functioning brain cells a long time ago.
What happens if you sneak into Mexico, Billy Boy?
BOR = POS
Once they crossed the border into our land without proper papers, they made themselves criminals by breaking our immigration laws. Is that really that hard of a concept to wrap his mind around?
You can always count on BOR to expose himself as the fool he really is.
He really should just be a game show host. Like who’s smarter than a 3rd grader.
He’s losing it.....he also stated that GZ ‘racially profiled’ Trayvon.
Loofahs and falafals, et. al.
I believe the legal classification is “misdemeanor,” not a felony but still a criminal act.
Someone got Bill’s “Mind Right” over at Fox News. He’s definitely in the tank for Amnesty and all that...not sure what’s up. In any case, I want to see an enforcible border policy enacted and in place for three until I’ll even think about amnesty. I don’t trust the feds and that’s the case no matter who has the presidency. Ideally, we get e-verification and some sort of guest worker policy up and running. Once I see it working for a number of years...then I’ll go for some sort of amnesty. That’s just me.....
Who gives a fig what he says.
They’re not?? Well then, O Idiot, open up your house and I’ll scoop up 50 of these “good citizens” in front of Home Depot entrance right here in Hollywood as there’s at least 100 hundred of them at the entrance.
I’ll make sure to drop them off at your house. Makes sure to feed them OK?
It is a crime that oreily is allowed to spew his ignorance.
He’s using a correct word — civil — in some respects, however, he’s being totally dishonest. When one says “civil matter”, they mean its up to a Plaintiff to sue a Defendant in a civil court. That’s NOT how immigration offenses work.
Its true that immigration isn’t in the list of federal criminal offenses in 18 USC, but there’s a good reason for that: immigration offenders are not US citizens — at least not alien offenders. Title 8 covers immigration and has listed in there “civil penalties,” but those penalties look an awful lot like criminal sentences - fines and imprisonment.
I look at it this way. as a conservative, of course I agree with oreilly a lot and never agree with, lets say, chris Matthews. but here’s a question I never thought to ask until now.
irrespective of whose views you agree with, who do you think is in it more for the money and less to change America?
to me the answer is Matthews cares more about transforming America, he’s probably been trying to do that since college.
oreilly was born in an America that shared his views, he never grew up with a burning desire for change.
looking at it in that light, you can see that oreilly might view things more about his ratings and not taking extreme views, which people are now starting to paint the closed border crowd with.