Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
“..because ‘it’s not science’...”

Actually, I get this from many theistic and typical evolutionist.

They DON”T own the facts, They are NOT smarter than I (though they may be expertise in their fields) and I can see the evidence for myself.

We are all Bias.....but which side would you rather be on, the other side of eternity?

27 posted on 06/06/2013 10:39:59 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: kimtom

[[We are all Bias.....but which side would you rather be on, the other side of eternity? ]]

I’m on the only side that is supoported by the facts- creation- Eternity is fasr too long to gamble on some godless hypothesis which contradicts it’s own laws of nature-

[[I am glad you are not taking MY words apart.....]]

I guess I do have a habit of puttign someone’s words into different contexts- But basically, the complexity theory is nothign but an attempt to rule God out of the equation (or to delegate Him to an inconsequential role) regardign creation and irreducible complexity-

I wasn’t familair with Kolmogorov so whgat little reasearch I’ve doen it appears that his theory is quite a bit different than Sahannon’s law- or shannon entropy- Both are a means of measuring infomration,

William Demski seems to have refuted the idea that complexitiy doesn’t need an itnelligent designer in his ‘specified complexity’ theory in his No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence


31 posted on 06/06/2013 11:23:24 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson