[[We are all Bias.....but which side would you rather be on, the other side of eternity? ]]
I’m on the only side that is supoported by the facts- creation- Eternity is fasr too long to gamble on some godless hypothesis which contradicts it’s own laws of nature-
[[I am glad you are not taking MY words apart.....]]
I guess I do have a habit of puttign someone’s words into different contexts- But basically, the complexity theory is nothign but an attempt to rule God out of the equation (or to delegate Him to an inconsequential role) regardign creation and irreducible complexity-
I wasn’t familair with Kolmogorov so whgat little reasearch I’ve doen it appears that his theory is quite a bit different than Sahannon’s law- or shannon entropy- Both are a means of measuring infomration,
William Demski seems to have refuted the idea that complexitiy doesn’t need an itnelligent designer in his ‘specified complexity’ theory in his No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence
ah, which is the goal.
So, evolutionist need intelligence (design) to counter God, so the come up with equations (math-intelligent) to explain the complexity in design(?)
Philosophical arguments, which scientist do use, cannot be won is the ID debate. But their hope is in Math, like genome was to Biology.
In this case God is in the details......... ;0