did he not ridicule ID scientists as beign unscientific? The probability estimates he was dismissing are the mathematical probability estimates laid out by leadign mathematical scientists and professors and he’s telling us we shouldn’t do that because ‘it’s not science’- that is a purjorative remark- espcecially when it was secular scientists that came up with the probability estimates showing that it is impossible- It grinds against the hypothesis of macroevolution, and therefore we’re cosntantly eign told it’s ‘not real science’ and that ID scientists and advocates aren’t ‘real scientists’ and ReaderDavid did just that in his statements-
Actually, I get this from many theistic and typical evolutionist.
They DON”T own the facts, They are NOT smarter than I (though they may be expertise in their fields) and I can see the evidence for myself.
We are all Bias.....but which side would you rather be on, the other side of eternity?