Kermit Gosnell Attorney Furious About Fox News Murder Trial Special

Life news ^ | Steven Ertelt

[radiohead]

I caught it last night and was horrified. I used to be pro-abortion but got my mind right about 10 years ago. This guy had 15 yr olds doing medical procedures! Near full term babies just murdered, women treated without respect and without regard to their medical condition.

I lived not too far from there, but never heard of this guy. How someone can be so humanless, so brutal, without everyone knowing, I don’t know. Well, I do - as one witness said, “I did what I was told to do.” Disgusting ‘people.’

[epow]

It doesn't matter to me, or to God for that matter, whether those babies were killed in the womb, the birth canal, or after birth. What matters to me, and should matter to every decent human being, is that those tiny, innocent, human beings were painfully, torturously murdered in either case.

The only proper sentence for murder aforethought is death, but in light of the current lenient attitude of most Americans regarding moral issues I don't expect anything more than a light slap on the wrist for this despicable baby murderer and possibly his willing accomplices. But true justice will be eventually served, if not in this present world's court it will be served in God's Supreme Court.

On that note, I have no doubt that unless the 7 Justices of the USSC who voted in 1973 to legalize murdering babies in their mothers' womb have repented or will repent of that unspeakable sin and seek forgiveness through the blood sacrifice made by Jesus Christ on the cross they will join the murderous Philly doctor in one of the warmer cells of hell.

[christx30]

CNN’s new motto should be “We report. You decipher.”

[fellowpatriot]

“Kermit Gosnell’s defense attorney is saying there wasn’t enough evidence that these babies were alive after birth.

If they weren't alive then why snip their spines?

[BobL]

“Jack McMahon claims the special was designed to sway members of the jury, even though jurors have been instructed to not watch or read any media coverage of Gosnell and the murder trial.”

I can understand this. There is NO WAY that I would EVER trust a trial to give me all the facts. The first thing I would try to figure out is whether the accused has a history of priors. If he’s walked before, even though it was clear he was the killer (or whatever), he won’t do well with me.

I realize that I’m supposed to ONLY judge the crime at hand, but if the person should have been in jail 10 times over, I WILL find that out and take that into account. Countless people have died because of what jurors were not told.