Posted on 04/20/2013 1:32:59 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
I am sure these questions have been asked before, but:
1. Why were there no dogs involved in the search for scumbag #2? Could it be that someone higher up told the police it would be "offensive" the moose limbs if he was seen caught by a dirty dog?
2. In the video of the two Mooselimb scumbag terrorists walking together, who is the man in the white shoes, with the sunglasses, with the earpiece and cell phone standing in the doorway, watching them? And why was his face the only one blurred n the FBI video?
3. There was much outrage about the poor innocent boys who were the focus of a lot of internet speculation --the boy in the blue jacket, and the boy in the black jacket and white hat/sunglasses. Did anyone ask them what their saggy bags contained?
4. Did they only interview the boy in the blue jacket? If so, why? Where are they now?
5. The incredibly creepy, slouchy, tall bearded guy was ALSO the focus of a lot of internet speculation. Why no effort to find him? Or ask him about his feelings? What is his name? Where does he live? He looks like a marathon enthusiast?
6. Did anyone notice that the tall creepy guy's bag looked more like the exploded bag at the scene than the scumbag #2s?
My husband had to have a large melanoma taken off his arm and MD Anderson is the place for that. MD Anderson owns a swanky hotel that is connected by a walkway into their hospital. We checked in that hotel and I was amazed that we were close to being the only ones not in foreign dress.
Cancer put us together and we were helping each other with wheelchairs and elevator doors, etc. It didn't matter where we were from or how we were dressed, we all had a common goal - help our cancer stricken family member.
Is it possible that only Dzhokhar (white capped bomber) was carrying a bomb, and this is the other bomber???
It's quite possible there was supposed to be a third or even fourth bomb, but not all players were able to successfully execute.
Aha! Perhaps the terrorists with backpacks who WERE CARRYING THE ACTUAL PRESSURE COOKER BOMBS WERE WEARING WHITE BASEBALL CAPS, and other participants NOT carrying the actual bombs didn’t have white caps on!
That isn’t Dzhokhar, that is the track coach (Yassine Zaimi) of the kid in blue who came forward when he saw his photos on the internet (like this one). Those two were cleared by the FBI.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/runners-fingered-as-bombing-suspects-875362
Dogs were used, but I don’t know to what extent.
I heard on the police scanner one time of them requesting the canine units to return to their stations, as their shifts were over, and new ‘units’ would replace them.
I also heard, during the standoff near the boat, scanner references to the police dogs.
Here’s another question:
How could these two mohammedans possibly have guns in Massachusetts, a gun-free zone?
I think you’ve watched too many Southern Chain Gang movies. Bloodhounds can’t track cars.
What I'm saying is that you have teams of two; 1 is bomb carrier, the other is the spotter. That it's possible Tamerlan wasn't actually carrying a bomb (his younger brother was), and that the "cleared" coach was carrying the other along with his spotter.
Probably one or two other teams involved as well but they didn't execute for one reason or another.
FBI Counter-terrorism lexicon skips all references to ‘al qaeda’
“’...FBI training manual after a 2011 purge, does not even include the terms al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood, or jihad.’
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/sep/27/picket-fbi-counter-terrorism-lexicon-skips-all-ref/#ixzz2R3iYUn2F
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Police will not normally send a K9 officer where he is likely to be hurt or killed. They are not machines, and the officers become attached to them.
Maybe the cops know Muslims hate dogs and are likely to mistreat them.
How do you know dogs weren’t involved in the search?
You are commenting on the events race day. My statement related to the search operations prior to capture.
Both seem to be true
It is my experience that the white ghutra is seasonal..... summer. It is also the common, ordinary attire of the office.
The white is actually ubiquitous
It has nothing to do with royalty.
“How could these two mohammedans possibly have guns in Massachusetts, a gun-free zone?”
A gun didn’t come into play with them until after the two killed that policeman who was sitting in his car. They must have taken the guns and rifle, ammo, from his car. It was after that they had the shoot out with the cops.
Sorry, thought you meant race day. During the search for them, those cop types had so much gear on, if there were women one wouldn’t have been able to tell. I agree none were obvious.
A gun didnt come into play with them until after the two killed that policeman who was sitting in his car. They must have taken the guns and rifle, ammo, from his car. It was after that they had the shoot out with the cops.
&&&&
But, surely, in a gun-free state, everyone would know that it is guns that kill people, so bad guys could not possibly have guns.
Well, they got those guns from that cop car but I'm sure they regretted they had to use them in Mass. A pressure cooker bomb wasn't a gun so they felt okay with that. Bombs are okay in Mass., but guns are not. :o)
Of course, that’s it. Good analysis. They were good boys who were just were forced to use those guns.
Next up, I suppose, we will be asked why the cops need guns. Can’t they just talk nicely to the bad guys?
My daughter-in-law was an actress and was in a play at a prestigious theater (can't think of the name). My son and I were backstage before it started and I got to see what happens before a play starts. Then, my son and I saw the play and the three of us were going to “dine” at some restaurant.
When we came of the theater, there was chaos. A person had been found dead on the street, killed by a knife. There were cops everywhere, people were stunned and in a panic. My God, someone had been killed! A killer was on the loose! Of course, none of them had anything to defend themselves as they can't have a gun.
The next day, at about the same time, the cops wanted everyone who had been there to go back so a re-enactment could be done. The newspaper that day, the day after it happened, was covered with it on the front page. The people and the cops were consumed with this murder.
A while after that was when “officials” began to talk about outlawing knives of any kind outside a household.
If you are in your house there, you cannot lock yourself in a room as locks are not allowed. That is so firemen can get in your rooms if there is a fire. Do people break this law and put locks on? I don't know, but the house my son lives in has no locks. His house was built in past early times so locks weren't there to start with.
If you are a farmer on a large area of land, or own a large estate, you can file to get a rifle but not a handgun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.