Posted on 04/20/2013 1:32:59 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
I am sure these questions have been asked before, but:
1. Why were there no dogs involved in the search for scumbag #2? Could it be that someone higher up told the police it would be "offensive" the moose limbs if he was seen caught by a dirty dog?
2. In the video of the two Mooselimb scumbag terrorists walking together, who is the man in the white shoes, with the sunglasses, with the earpiece and cell phone standing in the doorway, watching them? And why was his face the only one blurred n the FBI video?
3. There was much outrage about the poor innocent boys who were the focus of a lot of internet speculation --the boy in the blue jacket, and the boy in the black jacket and white hat/sunglasses. Did anyone ask them what their saggy bags contained?
4. Did they only interview the boy in the blue jacket? If so, why? Where are they now?
5. The incredibly creepy, slouchy, tall bearded guy was ALSO the focus of a lot of internet speculation. Why no effort to find him? Or ask him about his feelings? What is his name? Where does he live? He looks like a marathon enthusiast?
6. Did anyone notice that the tall creepy guy's bag looked more like the exploded bag at the scene than the scumbag #2s?
His hands weren’t burnt nearly like what was claimed. I have a bunch of photos of him in the hospital on another thread. I think they were making up an excuse to get him into a controlled environment due to who he was. (I suspect part of the royal family.) Next post I’ll link to that thread.
There were canine units
Posts 42 and onward here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3010063/posts?page=42#42
Most of these have been scrubbed of the facebook pages but I copied all of them down and posted most through tinypic so they aren’t going anywhere.
In one of those photos, part of his upper arm is bandaged so he may have gotten some shrapnel.
I had a Saudi business associate, a member of a prominent business family, that was a student at UCLA when Bobby Kennedy was shot. He and others were rounded up pronto and detained and eventually released.
Given the unwarranted suspicion and perhaps even hatred some Americans have for everything Saudi, it is reasonable to assume removing someone of prominence, not anywhere near royal status, would be be a prudent action of the Saudi Ambassador.
The most offensive part of the whole production was that the only real mention of a woman doing anything was ordering Doughnuts, first one hundred and then a half hour later, another hundred.
The states attorney did make a good speech but that was about it for women.
The Royal Family is very quick to pull out their own from situations like this.
I think there may be some dotted line connection though, specifically around the mosque. The Saudis are known to fund mosques around the world. I bet they funded the mosque the terrorists attended and wouldn’t be surprised if this kid was somehow a conduit of the funding. He seems to be someone everyone wants to meet, including the First Lady (wish we had some photos of that).
Not even a sammich?
That's what puzzles me too. Dad's in Russia, Mom does some occasional shoplifting but no jobs mentioned and she is often in Russia too.
I saw one article that Tamerlan was once pizza driver, but in another article he has a Mercedes (not the carjacked one).
The youngest one is a full time college student who lives in an apartment, not in the house he reportedly shares with Tamerlan. Youngest is a party boy, works out at the gym, etc. but has no part time job to pay tuition or anything else.
Who financed their lives?
Who financed Obama?
Well it’s a ‘67 Mercedes wagon, so it’s not like he spent $100,000 for it (though it might cost that much to maintain over a few years).
US Taxpayers and mosques full of terrorists.
If you look at the pictures that the sheik took in the hospital, one of the guys that visited him was some sort of sultan. That sultan’s fb page lists the Islamic Center of Boston as one of his likes. Kind of strange since he is from TX just up visiting. Also, ISB is the mosque that the brothers attended for their clandestine radicalization.
More likely than a conspiratorial conjecture is the very legitimate probability that the person was a student.
More likely than being a Royal is the person was a member of a very prominent business family of which there are lots and lots. The Saudi’s know that for many career paths, the best education is available in America. They are or at least were partial to smaller schools where temptation was not as great as known party schools.
The people of whom I speak are unknown to the biased anti Saudi folk who post here. They are there however and the very people that come here to be educated are or will be in control. They are not the radical stereotyped wackos who have left the country on Jihad.
His name is Sultan, not a title. He is actually from pretty close to where I live. Kind of creeped me out he was from New Boston Texas.
hmmmm.. his name is Sultan. Prounounced Sul Taan
That is not a rank but a name
Then someone said the FBI was bringing in a negotiator so the dogs seemed to not be in the picture after all.
He was wearing a white Ghutrah in almost every photo which is unique to the Royal Family. Now, the Saudi Royal Family is very large, thousands of members. (Dark blue Ghutrahs are worn by those who claim a descent to Mohammed, checkered or pattered Ghutrahs are worn by regular citizens with the color and pattern often designating where they are from, solid color Ghutrah are reserved for those of extreme importance with white designating some link to the royal house of Saud).
I saw a number of medical women running toward the victims. I heard an interview of a woman doctor who was running in the race and she ran immediately to an official, identified herself and was let in the area to help victims. Women were there helping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.