Posted on 03/30/2013 6:48:42 PM PDT by WXRGina
Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for office.
Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.
Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.
Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for oral arguments.
“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.
Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and his integrity and legal acumen.”
“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”
The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
ping for later
Most important rulings they could make now would include enforceable subpoenas for original documents now held by the state of Hawaii and the federal government. That would start the process of a drip-by-drip loss of public confidence in the Presidency as more and more incriminating evidence is finally released, which is part of the scenario that led to a resignation in 1974.
But a court cannot evict a sitting president, aside from the DC district court in a Quo Warranto proceeding.
Good news...hope that Judge Moore allows a hearing. I hope he does not go Phony Con on this.
Doesn't Quo Warranto roughly translate as "By What Right"? If then there is not right for him to be the President then there is no eviction, for he never was President; if he has the right then that would be affirmed in a Quo Warranto -- or am I wrong?
We all know this dirtbag is a criminal, commie fraud and has in no way proven his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President.
It’s the ultimate sickening shame for our nation.
And, so far, it is clear that the “powers that be” that are backing him are more powerful than our most sacred foundations.
Massive civil disobedience may be the only peaceful way of getting this administration to stand down. Release of incriminating documents is the way to motivation of the “low information” public. Getting a court to order documents to be released hasn’t happened yet, and this effort started in 2008!
That’s right. And the fact that no one can touch this idiot (legally, of course) is a testament to how very powerful the ones from Hell who are backing him are.
sfl
The good Judge requires some strong protection.
>We all know this dirtbag is a criminal, commie fraud and has in no way proven his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President.<
.
There is an entire Congress that will disagree with you.
You don’t think so?
Start with asking your Senators and then your Representatives and they will all swear that Obama is legit.
AMEN.
Yes, that's right. And, it testifies to my earlier statement that the powerful forces of Hell that are backing this evil mystery man, this communist usurper, are more powerful than all the forces of the founding of our nation, not to mention all common sense.
Bump
Impeachment File on B. Hussein Obama.
“But a court cannot evict a sitting president, aside from the DC district court in a Quo Warranto proceeding.”
Not true!
A President may be forced to vacate by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify.
Death is determined by a signed death certificate by a licensed, attending physician. The Presidential Succession act is implemented without advice or consent of Congress.
Resignation is determined by a resignation letter from the President to the Sec of State. After the Sec. of State accepts it, the Presidential Succession act is implemented without the advice or consent of Congress.
Removal from office is determined by a 60 vote majority in the Senate after a hearing presided over by a Judge after the House passes an affirmative vote for impeachment.
Inability is determined by a majority vote of the President’s cabinet. The Presidential Succession Act is implemented without the advice or consent of Congress.
Failure to Qualify is determined in a Court of law. The Presidential Succession act is implemented without the advice or consent of Congress.
Each and every one of the most powerful people on the planet. government, civilian and military know Obama is not eligible. Thus complicit to one degree or another. Many of them legally so.
The problem is self evident.
ping to Klayman eligibility filing with Judge Roy Moore...
Why can’t a court convict a sitting President? Couldn’t the court prosecute for fraud?
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.