Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Agrees To Pay $40K To Women Mistakenly Shot At During Dorner Hunt
AP) ^ | March 14, 2013 5:26 PM

Posted on 03/14/2013 7:02:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Edited on 03/14/2013 7:47:19 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

LA Agrees To Pay $40K To Women Mistakenly Shot At During Dorner Hunt

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The city has agreed to give $40,000 to two women whose pickup was shot up by LAPD protection detail that mistook their vehicle for the truck driven by rogue ex-cop Christopher Dorner during his rampage, officials announced Thursday.

The tax-free settlement covering the pickup and other property came quickly after the women’s attorney, Glen Jonas, rejected Chief Charlie Beck’s offer of a replacement truck because the women would have had to pay taxes. The deal specified no admission of liability.

Excerpt, read the rest at LAcbsLocal/AP



TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; dorner; lapd; leo; losangeles
I'm no fan of greedy plaintiffs, but $40,000 seems awfully light!
1 posted on 03/14/2013 7:02:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They better add a couple of zeros after that number.


2 posted on 03/14/2013 7:03:34 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Shot at? I thought they were hit...


3 posted on 03/14/2013 7:04:54 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

No admission of guilt? Oh brother. Shoulda taken them to the cleaners (yes, the taxpayers).


4 posted on 03/14/2013 7:06:20 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That is just to cover the truck and other property damages. More to come.


5 posted on 03/14/2013 7:07:39 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Normal isn't normal anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

As I understand it, this compensation is only for the truck, and they have not waved the right to sue for personal injury etc..


6 posted on 03/14/2013 7:09:42 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Where are the criminal charges against the cops?


7 posted on 03/14/2013 7:14:06 PM PDT by TSgt (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Must have had a “shaggy Dog hair cut.” Those are a freebie.


8 posted on 03/14/2013 7:14:50 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (Forget Mexico. Put the border fence around California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Last line posted.

“Jonas, who noted he has waived all his fees, said he hoped that all other issues, including personal injury, can be resolved without the need to file a lawsuit or have a trial.”

The attorney plans to be paid in a subsequent settlement that covers personal injury. He wavied his fee to keep the settlement under 50,000.

LA can settle cases for less than 50,000 with out a lot of red tape. This just a way to get them some tax free cash up front.

Lawyers don’t do cases like this for free.


9 posted on 03/14/2013 7:15:08 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Normal isn't normal anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The attorney wants a bigger cut.

They would have had to come up with his fee out of their pocket, if they had just accepted a new truck

And he ain't got time for that

10 posted on 03/14/2013 7:16:26 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I believe there should be a few zero’s tacked on to that for the stupidity and thuggishness of the cops just opening up on a civilian like that.


11 posted on 03/14/2013 7:17:58 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Darn right it’s light....And the cops belong in prison...


12 posted on 03/14/2013 7:19:29 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
they need a better lawyer...
13 posted on 03/14/2013 7:21:41 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

No admission of guilt. No admission that the LA cops are the laughingstock of the country.


14 posted on 03/14/2013 7:23:27 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

LA police got off very cheaply.


15 posted on 03/14/2013 7:26:12 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This is just for the truck.


16 posted on 03/14/2013 7:36:56 PM PDT by passionfruit (When illegals become legal, even they won't do the work Americans won't do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Those cops need to go back to vehicle identification school.


17 posted on 03/14/2013 7:37:09 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Obama's vision - No Job is a Good Job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
"That is just to cover the truck and other property damages. More to come."

There'd better be!

18 posted on 03/14/2013 7:40:16 PM PDT by Baynative (Lord, keep your arm around my shoulder and your hand over my mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TSgt
Where are the criminal charges against the cops?

Bingo. There are the laws for us, and the laws for our betters. You or me, we'd be likely already having our jury picked and probably facing attempted murder charges with hate crime enhancements, with an offer on the table to plead to attempted manslaughter with a ten year sentence.

19 posted on 03/14/2013 7:44:33 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
I was just thinking about this case tonight.

I'm not sure I understand just WHY the officers opened fire on a truck that: Wasn't the color of the perp's truck, wasn't the same make/model, had 2 people in it, when pulled over why didn't the people in the truck simply obey officer's commands, and barring some kind of "furtive move" simply arrest the folks?

To make matters worse, they didn't (thankfully) KILL one of the two women in the truck, despite turning the cab into swiss cheese.

So we're left with stupid incompetent cops, or on the other hand, thank God the LAPD is full of stupid, incompetent cops.

20 posted on 03/14/2013 7:48:40 PM PDT by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

But is it gonna be tax free....


21 posted on 03/14/2013 7:57:05 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever (I'm going Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That’s a cheap gratuity for negligently shooting to kill.


22 posted on 03/14/2013 8:04:59 PM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“I’m no fan of greedy plaintiffs, but $40,000 seems awfully light!”

Especially since it was no accident. That was officers thinking that they could be executioners.


23 posted on 03/14/2013 8:06:27 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (One "bitter clinger" praying for revival. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I think they wasted that much money in missed shots. Screwballs have been watching too many James Bond movies where everybody but the hero is a horrible shot.


24 posted on 03/14/2013 8:08:18 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Conservatives refused to unite; now we pay the price!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Plus they will create Assistant Chief position for the brave officers that did the shooting. $ 40,000.00 is an insult to the two women. The officers that were shooting at them did everything in their power to take their lives away from them. In a just world, the cops would be facing attempted murder charges, instead they will be promoted to Assistant Chiefs or Special assistant to the Mayor.


25 posted on 03/14/2013 8:18:06 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

You are kidding, right?


26 posted on 03/14/2013 8:19:03 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

The report I heard on KFI sounded good.

The police chief Charlie Beck promised a new truck.

If the city or a third party had given them a truck it would be taxable gift. (No taxes with this plan.)

The city of LA can settle law suits less than $50,000 with just a few signatures and doesn’t need a city city council hearing. (Fast)

To keep the settlement under $50,000 the lawyer waived his fees. He knows he will get paid in full when they get their personal injury settlement.

The only agreed to litigation involving property damages. Personal injury is not covered and will be settled latter.

I found a link at KFI radio but it wasn’t working when I tried it. Too much traffic maybe.

Other details that caused problems. The truck was not paid for and they still owe on it. The police still have the truck as part of the internal investigation into the shooting. I forget how their insurance played in to thed picture.


27 posted on 03/14/2013 8:22:12 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Normal isn't normal anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: boop

They shot it up because they could do it and get away with it. Just like the Nevada cops shot down the guy at Cosco like he was a dog.


28 posted on 03/14/2013 8:22:14 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Pikers.

The shootees should be getting the pensions of 4 or 5 officers.

29 posted on 03/14/2013 8:29:39 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Not a suitable settlement. Not even close. The sum of money was not nearly enough for emotional duress and property loss.

Also need convictions against the officers who fired the shots for reckless endangerment and loss of their jobs. Until both matters are rectified, the case remains open in my mind.

Also, the DOJ should be launching an investigation of the LAPD AND Sgt. Teri Evans in regard to this case.

30 posted on 03/14/2013 8:30:09 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop

“Pulled over”? Oh my that never came close to happening. It was spray and pray from a distance.


31 posted on 03/14/2013 8:59:56 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“The State’s Agents nearly murdered you, but we’ll offer you this in payment. Best be grateful, Peasants!”


32 posted on 03/14/2013 9:18:46 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; BenLurkin

If these women dont’ have a lawyer they need to get one NOW.

40K? That’s BS, they both could have been killed.

That behavior on the part of the cops was pretty much depraved indifference and they need to write a MUCH BIGGER check.

And I say that as a true blue conservative law firm bookkeeper. And American. And somebody the cops better not ever open fire on like that, because 40K? I’m not laughing but....that’s a joke.


33 posted on 03/14/2013 9:18:47 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

I would sue their ****s off.


34 posted on 03/14/2013 9:23:34 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: boop

“I’m not sure I understand just WHY the officers opened fire on [that] truck...”

Nobody really does. And that they couldn’t tell two women from one (rather large) man is also disturbing.

Look, I can never see the details of other drivers because I guess I’m about 1/3 blind, but hubby can. I mean I can’t tell if a person driving some other vehicle is male or female, old or young, what race they are, Tall and Short, that’s as much as I can perceive.

But, hubby can tell and I’d like to think the cops can too, at least before they open fire.

I have to say I used to be a very law-and-order conservative. But it’s the news I’ve read on FR that’s made me much more skeptical about cops in general.

And this was just an outrage. I feel like that could have been me in that car. I’m a middle aged woman, I might be out there on my paper route, I’m not Hispanic, but HELLO I’m not a 6”5” black guy either, so please don’t shoot at me regardless of my vehicle!


35 posted on 03/14/2013 9:33:36 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: boop
I'm not sure I understand just WHY the officers opened fire on a truck that: Wasn't the color of the perp's truck, wasn't the same make/model, had 2 people in it,

Not to mention neither of them was a large, black male. As far as I know the truck wasn't pulled over they cops just started shooting.

36 posted on 03/14/2013 9:37:45 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
Screwballs have been watching too many James Bond movies where everybody but the hero is a horrible shot.

You're missing an important component here. In the movies if the range is close, between cars, for instance, that are only a few feet apart, or across a room with the shooters hiding behind furniture, no one, not even the hero, can hit anything except in the last several seconds of the fire fight, the bad guys are spraying lead out of full auto firearms shooting up the cars or rooms(which ever applies)and the good guys are armed with semi-auto handguns and missing most of their shots, finally the hero shoots a perp, one shot from his handgun while the perps and other cops couldn't hit an elephant.

However, if they are outside and the bad guy is getting away and probably 100 yards down the street the hero can then hit him right between the eyes with a hastily aimed shot from his trusty 9MM.

The idea on the close scenes is to make a firefight last a long time to add excitement to the movie, never mind reality,who needs that? While on the long shot if the hero didn't hit him the perp would escape making the hero look stupid.

37 posted on 03/14/2013 10:39:16 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
“Pulled over”? Oh my that never came close to happening. It was spray and pray from a distance."

I didn't know that.

Even with a dangerous fugitive I just assumed that they made the truck pull over.

If true, these cops are out of control sickos.

These women should OWN the LAPD.

A new truck doesn't come close to "atoning" for this debacle.

Oh, we almost killed you for no reason? Here's a new truck, for FREE!

No, no reason to thank us, just enjoy your NEW TRUCK!.

Are we cool, now?

38 posted on 03/14/2013 11:03:14 PM PDT by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: boop

What else, could these women do, in POLICE STATE LOS ANGELES? What else could they do?


39 posted on 03/14/2013 11:15:59 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: boop

The situation was that the cops were guarding one of Dorner’s manifesto targets, and obviously insanely jumpy, and the women were delivering newspapers in the neighborhood in morning darkness from the truck (driving slowly and pulling over to throw the papers out, turning off lights when they turned so as not to wake people in their houses) One cop fired, and once that happened, there was a “shots fired!” frenzy where everyone else piled in.


40 posted on 03/15/2013 4:27:06 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: calex59
The idea on the close scenes is to make a firefight last a long time to add excitement to the movie, never mind reality,who needs that?

The first time I saw Star Wars I couldn't help thinking how ineffective blasters were.

One guy with an Uzi could have blasted his way through the entire stormtrooper force with no problem.

41 posted on 03/15/2013 7:46:45 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Shooting Victims to LAPD: Keep Your Truck and FOAD
Posted on March 21, 2013 by Dan Zimmerman

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/03/daniel-zimmerman/shooting-victims-to-lapd-keep-your-truck-and-foad/#more-211563


42 posted on 03/21/2013 8:54:51 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson