Nazi doctors: Hitler was gay, took female hormones

The Washington Examiner ^ | 1/7/2013 | Paul Bedard

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

(How many Communist countries had “Democratic” in their name?)

---

Say, North Korea calls themselves the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. That must make them Tea Party (as opposed to “TEA Party) just like you! That’s because Tea Republicans are Tea Party. Right?

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

You are the one that has been going back and forth shouting at posters on this thread while ignoring my post to you. I think you only accidentally responded to me this time.

---

Tea Party/Progressive Terrorist/Jihadists are notoriously unstable.

[Revolting cat!]

Wikipedia excerpt for starters, with footnotes and links to sources at the source of the article:

Nazi Führer Adolf Hitler had objected to the party's previous leader's decision to use the word "Socialist" in its name as Hitler at the time instead preferred to use "Social Revolutionary".[14] Upon taking over the leadership, Hitler kept the term but defined socialism as meaning a commitment of an individual to a community.[14] Hitler did not want the ideology's socialism to be conflated with Marxian socialism, and claimed that true socialism does not repudiate private property unlike the claims of Marxism, and claimed that the "Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning" and said that "Communism is not socialism. Marxism is not socialism."[15] Nazism favoured private property, freedom of contract, and promoted the creation of national solidarity that would transcend class differences.[16][17] The Nazis outlawed strikes by employees and lockouts by employers, because these were regarded a threat to national unity.[18] Instead, the state controlled and approved wage and salary levels.[18]

Sounds like socialism to me. Whether it is left or right wing as it appears so critical for you is today immaterial.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

[Revolting cat!]

To the simpletons, useful idiots and propagandists RIGHT WING simplyt= means Bad. Recall the failed 1991 Soviet coup d’état attempt by the old Communist guard. These guards of the Communist orthodoxy, a mere year or two earlier considered leftist, were automatically labeled Right Wing by the Western media, only because they were thought to be B-A-D! You’re bad, you’re Right Wing, it’s as simple as that.

[Windflier]

Sniff. Sniff.

I've also picked up a strange whiff from that one.

[svcw]

Ok ok ok ok, wait till I stop laughing.......Really are you now saying that communism is right wing.........hahahahahahahha
Seriously, now why are you on FR?
Seems as though you would be way happier on DU................lolololololo!!!!

[svcw]

I would like to thank you for saying I am ignorant in actually thinking the nazi party, which believed in TOTAL government control was not left wing .......hahahahahahaha!!!!!ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh, good lord.........sorry sides hurting from laughing!

[nathanbedford]

Thank you for the link to The Pink Swastika which I have read through. It raises a series of fascinating questions:

1. Is the study to be credited?

2. If it is to be believed, how much weight should it receive?

3. Assuming the authors have delivered good scholarship and further assuming that the study deserves consideration, what should we make of the authors' own disclaimer that the dichotomy between "femme" and "Butch" homosexuals of the Nazi era were probably not the majority but represent the extremes; in other words does this study have application only to the peculiar atmosphere of the Nazi era? Can we apply this dichotomy to homosexuality and politics today?

4. If the analysis is to be accepted can it be applied to modern society? That is, can we say that the great danger of opening the Armed Forces to homosexuals is not that it might render the force effete but that it might brutalize it?

5. I note that Shirer is quoted from his book that for at least a generation was regarded as the historical Bible of the Nazi era, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. He is quoted disparagingly referring to homosexuals. Is there a discernible alteration in the historical treatment of the Nazi era which deemphasizes the homosexuality of the Nazis today compared to a more frank exposition up to a time period which would roughly coincide with the Stonewall Revolution? If so, can we draw parallels to the cleansing of homosexuality from the Nazi era (if it exists) with the treatment of AIDS in the homosexual world?

6. Most of us would certainly concede that there is and always has been and antipathy against religion, especially Christianity, among homosexuals. I have assumed that that was a natural reaction to the biblical treatment of homosexuality and the present time opposition to granting homosexuals equal rights. This treatment adds another dimension to this antipathy which is the occult and suggests that homosexuality and the occult have always gone hand-in-hand which further suggests that if opposition to homosexuality is mitigated, or even withdrawn, it will not affect this inherent hostility.

7. If this study is to be credited, what does it tell us about Obama, specifically, can we draw any parallels between his alleged homosexuality and Hitler's?

[central_va]

[jsanders2001]

From the Pink Swasitka:

    ”American civilization rests on the basic principles of Christian morality, which have their origin in the Hebrew Scriptures.  The reason why the Nazis first attacked the Jewish people and swore to exterminate them physically and spiritually is because the teachings of the Bible, both the Torah and the New Testament, represent the foundations on which the whole system of Christian ethics rests.  Remove the Bible as the constellation that guides the American Ship of State and the whole edifice of American civilization collapses. “

Written in 1995 but boy did they get that one right.

[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

Presidents were afraid of his data files. That fact does not negate my assertion that they would have used any known perversion to destroy him. Fear creates a fight or flight mentition and perversion on the part of Hoover would have given the Presidents tools with which to fight.

[Albion Wilde]

nathanbedford, I just provided the link, and am not able to evaluate the veracity or importance of the Pink Swastika; but certainly it is food for thought, since the topics it covers were ordinarily considered unpublishable in regular news outlets during the immediate post-WWII period. The author is a prominent pro-marriage advocate. Other than that, I encourage you to do your own further research.

[Albion Wilde]

"Remove the Bible as the constellation that guides the American Ship of State and the whole edifice of American civilization collapses."
Written in 1995 but boy did they get that one right.

Amen to that! We are a house of cards now.

[fso301]

Thank you for the link to The Pink Swastika which I have read through. It raises a series of fascinating questions:

1. Is the study to be credited?

Pink Swastika could be better referenced. A very well researched and referenced book is The Hidden Hitler by Lothar Machtan.