Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Resolute Conservative

Good points all. As a former rugby player, I believe that the players should have reduced padding and no helmets. I don’t like seeing a 300 lb. lineman driving a smaller player into the ground with all the force he can muster. The object of such an act is to injure a player; nothing else.

Case in point: When UCLA’s Anthony Barr sacked USC’s Matt Barkley, he drove him to the ground with all his body weight. Sacking him wasn’t enough, was it?

But, that’s what sells tickets.

Basketball has gotten crazy. I wonder when they are going to put a cage around the courts?


124 posted on 12/31/2012 11:28:43 AM PST by Loud Mime (Conservatives refused to unite; now we pay the price!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Loud Mime
Good points all. As a former rugby player, I believe that the players should have reduced padding and no helmets.

For the NFL to work in that fashion, they would have to ban high and low tackling, as they do in rugby. I don't see that happening, especially as long as they allow blocking.

As you know, one of the reasons rugby works like it does is that there's no blocking, with the sole exceptions I can think of being in a scrum or maul, and there's a penalty for collapsing the scrum. The impacts in rugby, while often forceful, are almost always chest-to-chest or shoulder-to-chest and you don't see the kinds of open-field hits you see in the NFL.

129 posted on 12/31/2012 11:46:39 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson