Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kim Kardashian pregnant with Kanye West's baby
AP via Foxnews ^ | December 31, 2012

Posted on 12/31/2012 5:54:04 AM PST by US Navy Vet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: US Navy Vet

Sickening !


81 posted on 12/31/2012 3:15:39 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
Why are these people glorified?

Kim Kardashian goes from Kanye's "Perfect Bitch" to his "Baby Mama"

Snip: …..Kim is still married to Kris Humphries. Maybe that’s why Kanye shouted out his “Perfect Bitch” at his last Revel performance in Atlantic City by referring to her as his “baby mama.” …….

82 posted on 12/31/2012 3:46:15 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

She’s just got a big butt. A lot of the photos you see are airbrushed, she’s fatter than she seems.


83 posted on 12/31/2012 6:04:22 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Just great, they’ve spawned. Yeah, this’ll turn out well.


84 posted on 01/01/2013 6:42:06 PM PST by opus86 (You get what you vote for, America. Enjoy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
...removing the stigma of having children outside of marriage is the primary ingredient to the destruction of our culture.

Agreed, but place the stigma where it belongs...upon the parents (BOTH parents).

85 posted on 01/02/2013 6:14:03 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: JimRed; mrsmel

Yes but the stigma that was once placed upon the child was also means to control the “parents” in the first place.

Folks in proper company would not wish to bring such a perception on the child either especially amongst the gentry in the white community.

Now that constraint is gone too.

When I grew up in the South in the 60s before Roe v Wade I knew one woman who had an illegitimate baby...one and the woman was a shame to her family no question. we had unwed mothers homes back then. My grandmother took her in the young woman being from her part of the “country”. The child was not scorned per se but not having a legal daddy did have a consequence.

That was but one social construct that folks back then felt was for the betterment of all...man/woman two parent families

No one hated the child but yet is was certain she would not make debutante or be head of the Tri Delt sorority either

and yes...plenty folks got married in a hurry

I am not advocating punishing children for the faults of the parents but yes being born out of wedlock did have some consequence and that did in my mind help maintain more chastity among young women.

If you remove any stigma from the child then one has essentially removed most of what used to keep folks in line. I remember distinctly hearing folks talk about why bring such shame to a child by your actions.

I realize it sounds harsh by our anything goes culture today where normalcy is scorned.


86 posted on 01/02/2013 9:27:10 AM PST by wardaddy (wanna know how my kin felt during Reconstruction in Mississippi, you fixin to find out firsthand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson