Posted on 11/11/2012 6:44:36 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne
.
2012-11-10
Is this General Petraeus's game plan for "Obama's Benghazi Scandal" ?
1) Resign, under the "false flag" on an alleged sexual affair ?
2) KNOW that the U.S. House Intelligence Committee will decide to SUBPONEA General Petraeus
3) Arrive at the Intelligence Committee hearing ...
4) REFUSE to Testify UNLESS ...
5) President "Zero", Hillary, and Leon Panetta are ALSO FORCED to testify, in a PUBLIC Hearing, sitting alongside General Petraeus, in REAL TIME, international TV cameras rolling ...
6) General Petraeus using that plan as a way to FORCE the cowardly, traitorous President "Zero" to ACCOUNT for ALL the EVIL perpetrated at Benghazi ?
.
Betrayus is just another Washington swell.
I have come to the conclusion that Washington ALWAYS protects their own.
Can’t trust any of them. PERIOD.
.
Now as CIA Director, General Pet, when did you first know about that fake so called offensive video? And how did it come about that you as CIA Director blamed it as causing spontaneous uprising? How many conversations have you ever had with the president? Who do you directly communicate with at the White House? How many conversations since you became CIA Director, have you had with Hillary Clinton. Did you ever discuss with anyone before 9-11-2012 the existence of that fake video? When?
There is no way Obama wants this guy under oath.
If that is indeed his plan, I look for him to suffer the same fate as Andrew Breitbart.
But this scenario??
Keep dreaming.
So, the only reason he won’t be testifying is because the chickensh*t Republicans refuse to supeona him.
For the Ladies and the first taste of Freedom ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VaTDvBo_zI&feature=related
dumbest plan I have ever heard....the President will never go before congress to testify
This is trending way beyond a mere cover up..
I've come up with even broader implications spawned by re-election, greater flexibility and purge time!
The purge was motivated by the desire on the part of the leadership to remove dissenters from the Party and what is often considered to have been a desire to consolidate the authority of Joseph Stalin Barack Obama. Additional campaigns of repression were carried out are planned against national minorities and social groups which were are being accused of acting against the Soviet state and the politics of the Communist Democratic Party.
Most public attention was will be focused on the purge of the leadership of the Communist Democratic Party, as well as of government bureaucrats and leaders of the armed forces, most some of whom were are Party members. The campaigns also affected target many other categories of the society: intelligentsia, peasants and especially those branded as "too rich for a peasant" (kulaks One-percenters), and professionals.
There by golly in nut shell.. wot? Plagiarized? I did not copy that from wiki.. d'oh! I thought s and /s removed text. Nevertheless.. meet the New Normal
I am guessing that ultimately Boehner will have the final say if he will allow the Republicans to issue a subpoena. There is at least one Republican that is reported to have said if General Pet does not show up he will be subpoena. I fully expect to read some breaking news scoop that the 'white house is in negotiations with Boehner to stop any attempts to subpoena' their General Pet.
Dude. I want some of whatever you’re smoking. ;)
I know. It would be nice if he would turn it around and show some “Honor”. I just don’t think so. He confessed to cheating on his wife. He lied to some congressmen about that stupid video. He knew they were on to him and he could have resigned earlier. Too many dishonorable actions. He may yet discover his soul, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
Upon resignation he lost his security clearance and whether given immunity or not will say “I can’t comment on that.” How convenient.
why would that work? I’ve seen that mentioned here before but don’t believe it.
My brother’s favorite saying is “One good f***ing deserves another.
I hope Petreaus mans up and exposes everything.
Supoena the mistress
Nope. Not by a longshot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.