Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Is that the college obozo went to?/s
1 posted on 11/08/2012 2:44:19 PM PST by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; all the best; AmericaUnite; ...
Thanks to Bon of Babble for this one! (poll is half way down in the middle)

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. (multiple votes using multiple internetz devices are allowed!) And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

2 posted on 11/08/2012 2:46:14 PM PST by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Guess Dems are still frothing over their 2000 loss.


3 posted on 11/08/2012 2:47:22 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

The electoral college isn’t why Romney lost. The Dems knew what states they needed and manipulated the machines to produce the desired result. No I can’t prove it but think about this:

Romney got 57 million votes on Tuesday and McCain got 60 million votes in 2008. Let me say that again Romney got 57 million votes on Tuesday and McCain got 60 million votes in 2008. Can anyone in their right mind think that is true?

Sorry I’m just not buying it. Undoubtedly there was massive voter machine manipulation going on.


4 posted on 11/08/2012 2:48:22 PM PST by Graneros (The most fundamental purpose of government is defense, not empire. – Joseph Sobran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Photobucket
5 posted on 11/08/2012 2:48:37 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Do you think the U.S. should do away with the electoral college?
Total Votes = 348
Yes 200 Votes, or 57.47 %
No 148 Votes, or 42.52 %

6 posted on 11/08/2012 2:51:41 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Total Votes = 372 - Yes 207 Votes, or 55.64% - No 165 Votes, or 44.35%


10 posted on 11/08/2012 2:58:46 PM PST by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

I still prefer the system they use in the uk which means that the leader of the party that takes 50%+ of most seats in the House equivalent runs the Govt. Does away with the electoral college and makes the house elections much more important. I’d also make a law that the President must currently hold office, i.e congress, senate or Gov when they run for the Presidency for a time of no less than 4 years. Congress term should be upped to 4 years. If they want to be President, they should be currently elected.

The Senate and then used as a back up to stop or pass the houses bills but can’t write laws.

I’d make the President come once a week to the house to answer congressmen’s questions like the British PM has to do.

Reform is seriously needed in the electoral dept.


13 posted on 11/08/2012 3:08:52 PM PST by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

No! Absolutely not. The Electoral College is one of the few remaining obstacles to Liberal totalitarianism and destruction of the sovereignty of the States of the Union and the individual voters in those states.


14 posted on 11/08/2012 3:10:45 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

No! Absolutely not. The Electoral College is one of the few remaining obstacles to Liberal totalitarianism and destruction of the sovereignty of the States of the Union and the individual voters in those states.


16 posted on 11/08/2012 3:16:37 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Yeah, lets dump it so that elections can be entirely decided by the urban areas of the nation (ie the Dems).

Anyone who wants to get rid of the Electoral College needs to go back and read the Founders to understand why it exists.

19 posted on 11/08/2012 3:22:26 PM PST by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome
Is that the college obozo went to?/s

Yes, he was the first ever to enroll as a foreign student.

25 posted on 11/08/2012 4:15:58 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

No.


26 posted on 11/08/2012 4:17:22 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

Vote was pretty even when I looked.

A popular vote, in a close presidential election, could easily result in recounts in every single voting precinct in the country, coast to coast. It would definitely result in more Acorn-type activity in populous blue states.

A more useful poll would be “Should the world series be decided on the traditional basis of ‘best four out of seven’ games or on the basis of total runs scored (or hits, stolen bases, fewest pitches, fewest errors, fewest players, coaches, managers ejected ... etc.)?


27 posted on 11/08/2012 4:20:35 PM PST by Mobties (Let the markets work! Reduce the government's footprint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

They don’t have a “Hell no!” option.


31 posted on 11/08/2012 5:03:43 PM PST by FrogMom (Chicken Little is coming, and he's right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dynachrome

What needs to be gotten rid of is open primaries. Why in the world does the GOP let non-party members have so much power in selecting who will be the GOP presidential representative?

It the republicans ever want a really candidate they need to restrict primary voting to party members only. Otherwise we will be stuck with more losers. If your chosen candidate can’t excite the base, he’s the wrong candidate.


32 posted on 11/08/2012 5:28:56 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson