Here is what we know.
The maker of this ‘film’ IS a convicted felon, an FBI snitch, and has been for years.
His partner is a falsestinian terrorist...who unfortunately for fibbi, happened to be Walid Shoebat’s first cousin.
FIRST they said he was an Israeli JEWISH billionaire...which suggests the original intent was to blame Israel for the anti-American protests.
THAT didn’t work, so they said he was a Coptic Christian dissident. Once again, Walid Shoebat exposed this lie. The felon is an Egyptian muslim.
He was ‘arrested’ and held incognito and will not see the light of day until AFTER the election...if at all.
The ‘film’ was leaked to an outspoken Egyptian muslim brotherhood cleric who just happened to have a very popular television show. He played it two days before 9/11.
The American Embassy in Cairo sent out an apology for the video BEFORE the start of protests in Egypt and sent their staff home early.
Put all these things together and you have a DELIBERATE setup to start protests on the arab street on 9/11, and yet there were NO protests in Libya...but we were TOLD there were by no one less than the president of the United States of America, who repeated it at the UN SIX times.
Now why do you suppose that was?
What evidence is there that the protest in Egypt had anything to do with film, other than the pre-apology from the embassy?
You’ve been following this the way it should be followed. Way to go. How does it feel to be a better journalist than all the former MSM combined? (softball question)
I believe MestaMachine has the facts exactly straight here.
However, we must understand that the "Muslims reacted to the video" explanation was BUILT INTO the plan from the beginning. That was going to be the ostensible explanation as to why Amb. Stevens was kidnapped. Of course, it was phoney from the word go.
But the fact that it was baked into the plan from the beginning explains why "it's the video! it's the video!" was all over the TV and out of the mouths of Obama's minions. That explanation was all set to go when the whole operation went south, courtesy of two SEALS protecting the Ambassador from what they believed were terrorist forces, which in fact were friends of Obama!
You’ve done well laying the groundwork.
This looks like plans were in the making for some time, which would explain the pull-back in security.
Though all did NOT go according to plan, objective being to move weapons to Syria and setup a WH campaign foreign policy op.