Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

There “can be no answer”?? Sean Carroll is no longer a scientist, then, but a witch doctor. Nor are any of those that are attempting to explain creation without a Creator, because they are asking us to have faith in their unobservable theories (i.e. fraud). We cannot observe a parallel universe. Nothing in the universe suggests any contraction—only expansion. Suggesting physical and chemical laws without a lawgiver is the ultimate fraud. Oppositions of science falsely so-called indeed.
1 posted on 10/01/2012 11:16:17 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Olog-hai
As a scientist, the answer is "NO!"

There are fundamental contradictions which remain unexplained, there are ongoing missing links, and as Einstein said, "As the diameter of a circle of light grows, so does the circumference of the darkness around it."

We don't know what we don't know yet, but those who are prideful in the knowledge we do possess think differently.

When we can come up with next week's weather forecast (a reliable one) week after week, when we can predict earthquakes with reliability, and say with certainty where and when lightning will strike, get back to me.

Otherwise, it is great fun to toss our meager intellects against the majesty of Creation in an effort to understand what God hath wrought.

34 posted on 10/02/2012 1:37:40 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I always thinks it is funny when scientists use their God given ability to Reason to prove there is no God. In order for Reason to be valid it cannot be the effect of an irrational cause, it must separate and independent of nature. Otherwise it is simply the epiphenomenon of chemical reactions, electrical impulses, etc.

God is laughing His head off over all this nonsense.


36 posted on 10/02/2012 1:49:06 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Trying to disprove the Creator is a fools errand.


38 posted on 10/02/2012 1:55:20 AM PDT by Bullish (The stink from this amateur regime smells all the way to Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

‘There was a group of scientists, and they were all sitting around discussing which one of them was going to go to God and tell him that they didn’t need him anymore.

‘One of the scientists volunteered and went to tell God he was no longer needed. The scientist says to God: “God, you know, a bunch of us have been thinking, and I’ve come to tell you that we really don’t need you anymore. I mean, we’ve been coming up with great theories and ideas, we’ve cloned sheep, and we’re on the verge of cloning humans. So as you can see, we really don’t need you.”

‘God nods understandingly and says, “I see. Well, no hard feelings. But before you go, let’s have a contest. What do you think?”

‘The scientist says, “Sure. What kind of contest?”

‘God replies, “A human-making contest where we make a human being.”

‘The scientist quickly agrees, “Sure! No problem.”

‘The scientist bends down and picks up a handful of dirt and says, “Okay, I’m ready!”

‘God shakes that divine head, “No, no, no…you go get your own dirt.”’


46 posted on 10/02/2012 3:11:13 AM PDT by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

“Although cosmic mysteries remain, Sean Carroll, a theoretical cosmologist at the California Institute of Technology, says there’s good reason to think science will ultimately arrive at a complete understanding of the universe that leaves no grounds for God whatsoever.”

Book to follow, foundations of religion and science shaken by controversial new theory, ground breaking study, blah and more blah. Just a few a little details to be worked out like....like....where do they find these people?


50 posted on 10/02/2012 4:21:43 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Since you cannot prove a negative, you cannot prove God does not exist.


52 posted on 10/02/2012 4:28:48 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

No competent scientist would assert a null hypothesis.


53 posted on 10/02/2012 4:29:53 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Hopey changey Low emission unicorns and a crap sandwich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

God will “rule out” scientists with a mere flick of an inconsequential mile-wide asteroid someday.


54 posted on 10/02/2012 4:46:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Over the past few centuries, science can be said to have gradually chipped away at the traditional grounds for believing in God.

When the very first sentence is this idiotic there is little hope for the ones thst follow...


55 posted on 10/02/2012 4:55:22 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

http://www.magisreasonfaith.org/


57 posted on 10/02/2012 5:00:21 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Science can only chip away at a primitive notion of a god of the gaps. For the one whose name is I AM, science merely shows the majesty of HIS creation! For the heavens proclaim the glory of God.


61 posted on 10/02/2012 5:41:54 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Whenever someone tells me there is no God, I ask them why is this year 2012? No honest person cam deny that this year is based on a time relationship to the birth of Jesus Christ.

And that B.C. thing means before Christ. Must mean that even secular historians recognize that Jesus was a historical figure who has to be so special that all of recorded history used his birth as its reference point.

Even the secular historians of the time acknowledge the death and resurrection of Christ.


67 posted on 10/02/2012 10:50:53 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Who created the science?


73 posted on 10/02/2012 5:22:48 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Science is blind.


74 posted on 10/02/2012 5:28:44 PM PDT by DungeonMaster (If a man will not work, then neither shall he eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
PING

Although cosmic mysteries remain, Sean Carroll, a theoretical cosmologist at the California Institute of Technology, says there's good reason to think science will ultimately arrive at a complete understanding of the universe that leaves no grounds for God whatsoever.

77 posted on 10/02/2012 6:27:54 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
“Over the past few centuries, science can be said to have gradually chipped away at the traditional grounds for believing in God.”

Now that's actually very funny!!! Most people of course realize the very opposite.

84 posted on 10/02/2012 8:14:22 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Encourage all of your Democrat friends to get out and vote on November 7th, the stakes are high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

One thing Carl Sagan said that I always found interesting is never left my mind, is that he actually believed in a God, and that someday a scientific discovery would be made that actually proved His existence...and I myself suspect that this thing will be discovered when scientists look harder at the properties of light. Without getting into it too deeply, there are some studies that seem to show that light “has a mind of its own”, or at least it seems to, under certain conditions. Anyway, anytime I hear that that scientists have made a new discovery about the properties of light, it commands my attention.


104 posted on 10/03/2012 11:56:30 AM PDT by Tuanedge (Warriors victorious in a hundred battles, flee when a tiger enters their tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I think that’s what’s called a category error.


112 posted on 10/03/2012 12:41:30 PM PDT by RichInOC (Jesus is coming back soon...and man, is He ticked off. (I'm trying to keep it clean.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

No.
Next question.


114 posted on 10/03/2012 12:44:57 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Most people will believe in God until they become immortal. One just doesn’t know what is on the other side.


120 posted on 10/03/2012 2:01:18 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson