[Olog-hai]

There “can be no answer”?? Sean Carroll is no longer a scientist, then, but a witch doctor. Nor are any of those that are attempting to explain creation without a Creator, because they are asking us to have faith in their unobservable theories (i.e. fraud). We cannot observe a parallel universe. Nothing in the universe suggests any contraction—only expansion. Suggesting physical and chemical laws without a lawgiver is the ultimate fraud. Oppositions of science falsely so-called indeed.

[Tublecane]

Duh, no. We are physical and as such can never perform metaphysical experiments. There’s this principle called “finite but unbounded,” and it is used to pretend nothing is outside the universe. It is nonsense.

[Berlin_Freeper]

I have reasons to believe there is a God.

[Arthur McGowan]

Some “theoretical cosmetologist” at some fancy “institute” has a problem with God? So?

[wastedyears]

I remember someone saying that we use science as a way to understand the makings of God.

[stars & stripes forever]

Science will have the answer sooner rather than later: http://www.patburt.com/

[gunsequalfreedom]

god created evolution. problem solved

[Arthur McGowan]

Always entertaining to read metaphysical pronouncements from people who have no acquaintance with metaphysics.

[fso301]

I half expect that late next month, headlines will announce the the Curiosity rover found evidence of life on Mars and therefore there is no God and Evangelicals are a bunch of superstitious fools and everyone needs to vote for hussein.

They tried that back in 1996.

[Moonman62]

Once again a journalist cherry picks a particular scientist to support the leftist agenda.

[GBA]

That’s backwards. It’s the other way around. Science will “prove” the probability/reality of God. Religion and science eventually end up at the same place.

[James C. Bennett]

Enjoy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

Lawrence Krauss gives a talk on our current picture of the universe, how it will end, and how it could have come from nothing. Krauss is the author of many bestselling books on Physics and Cosmology, including “The Physics of Star Trek.”

[Jonty30]

God is Truth.

If these scientists really are searching for truth, as opposed to searching for a world without God, they will find God.

If they really are searching for truth, they will have no choice but to find God.

[ThomasThomas]

They have been saying this since the time of David.

Psalm 14-1

The fool says in his heart, “God does not exist.”
They are corrupt; they do vile deeds.
There is no one who does good.

Silly scientist, how can you think you can learn everything when with every new discovery, you learn about even more things that you don’t know and never thought of before.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

God will be around long after Carroll is forgotten.

Perhaps God will rule out science, someday, and say, You just gotta have faith.

Stick around folks. It’s going to get very interesting.

But first we have to get rid of the Carbon Dioxide voodo scientists.

At least we have the plants on our side. They already have an organization, the EPA = Earth Plants Association.

[Cronos]

sorry, but to me a "theoretical cosmologist" is not a scientist. Science is tracking observable actions, not making leaps of fancy

He wants to replace one deity with another "an all powerful sense of something".

[central_va]

Will God Someday Rule Out the Possibility of Science?

[Daffynition]

Some might say....

I know nothing.

[lulu16]

To discuss with hubby later.

[chuckles]

All this discussion is a smoke screen. When you are dead, you cannot perceive God or Spiritual things. As you are born again, you then KNOW there is a change and a new person. A dead person will never understand this. As long as YOU see God, that is what matters. He introduces Himself to each individual in a way that is undeniable. The real question is why can't dead people understand what they see in other people changing their lives,.......because they are dead. They should be asking why they can't hear God, but it's easier to just say everyone else is crazy.

All the science discussion is just to try to prove there is no God. A Christian scientist knows there is God and sees His creation that way. If you look at the whole space program, it was mainly a program to try to prove water, bacteria, or some other organic material is somewhere off Earth. Finding a bacteria on Mars is a far cry from proving there is no God, but it makes them feel they are right and don't have to answer for their sins.

True science should prove evolution is impossible for an organism to stay alive long enough to mutate in a way to digest food, see with eyes, and other bodily functions. If you just look at the digestive system and it's enzymes, you should fall down in awe of the complexity involved to change a piece of meat into energy. How many organisms had to be born and then die because they couldn't eat and live before a mutant could digest food using hundreds of amino acids and enzymes? The mathematical possibilities are ZERO! How could they live long enough to reproduce without being able to eat? The questions write themselves.

[Happy Rain]

When secular science results in technological applications that produce reality and then life perhaps...

...until then it's all theory and theories that lack the logical and reasonable assumptions of a higher being being ultimately responsible for what is us and around us.