Without reading too far into his suggestions for survival, I take issue with some of his basic premises.
We are NOT running out of energy. The problem and solution is *political*. We don’t have the will to produce the energy, but we do have means.
The climate is *not* becoming less stable. That’s hogwash.
The world’s population, as an overall number is not the problem. Again, the problem with feeding and taking care of the people is a political problem, not an inherently resource based one.
bump
You’re right. We grow enough food to feed everyone - the problems are distribution, loss to disease and animals and waste. A lesser issue is micronutrients like vitamin A; there are enough calories, but getting micro-nutrients to kids is a secondary problem.
If food is still a big problem, supply and demand could solve it by driving up the cost of meat, a major consumer of grain.