Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watch Boehner completely ignore the 'No's' votes over the Establishment power grab
Youtube ^

Posted on 08/29/2012 9:36:23 AM PDT by Bigtigermike

The result of the RNC new rules will be to centralize power in the hands of the Republican Establishment in Washington at the expense of the grass roots. It will also have the effect of making a primary challenge to Romney from the right in 2016 (if he wins) more difficult, given that he will control the party apparatus to an unprecedented degree given his new rules. Mark Levin stated that John Boehner ignored the “nos” which were at least as loud, if not louder than the “ayes” so that he could give Romney surrogate John Sununu, standing right next to him, what he wanted. By simply circumvented the vote by declaring ”the ayes gave it” despite all evidence to the contrary. What has the Republican Party become?

(Note: this is the only video I could find of the coup and so the poster of the original video thinks this is Paulbots negative doings when it's not - as was noted yesterday, a lot of Tea Party and grassroots conservatives were upset as well because they know that the potential for the Establishment to rig the primaries in future at will is in play)

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: boehner; establishment; gope; palin; powergrab; romney; tampa

1 posted on 08/29/2012 9:36:27 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

What does he care. He will be reelected in his district and he will be Majority leader until he wants to give it up or we lose the House. We all complain and complain about things but do nothing to change it. For years we have said how much Romney is such a loser and guess what? As soon as the loser is nominated, he suddenly becomes the greatest thing on Earth. GOPe is going to do whatever it wants because they know the conservatives are going to lock step behind whoever it is regardless. The GOPe have it pretty good quite frankly.


2 posted on 08/29/2012 9:39:21 AM PDT by napscoordinator (2016 U.S. President Rick Santorum gave the best speech at the Convention! Congratulations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

The ignorant asking to be chained.


3 posted on 08/29/2012 9:40:30 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Just serving the eviction order that George Romney failed to serve in 64.

Photobucket
4 posted on 08/29/2012 9:41:23 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Yesterday I told a couple of friends about this. They dismissed it out of hand as a bunch of Paulnuts having a fit, and made it clear they don’t care about any crooked maneuverings the GOP might do.


5 posted on 08/29/2012 9:41:59 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

The end of the Republican Party as the conservative party.


6 posted on 08/29/2012 9:42:37 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningfull to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
They dismissed it out of hand as a bunch of Paulnuts

Alinsky tactic to silence dissent. It won't work and it won't matter who they blame when the bill comes due.

I am glad to see that Mark Levin, Michelle Malkin and others have spoken out against the idiocy of the "Paulnut" meme.
7 posted on 08/29/2012 9:49:08 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
They dismissed it out of hand as a bunch of Paulnuts having a fit

That's what it was. The intent of the rule changes were to deal with the paulbots who've been disrupting the state conventions and trying to impose minority will on the majority of Republicans and conservatives. These paulbots hate the Romney wing of the party like many here do, but they hate the Santorum/Huckabee social conservative wing of the party even more. Paulbots are not conservatives, just libertarians who realize their 3rd party is never going to get them anywhere. They are attempting a hostile takeover and Republicans at the local and state level were slow to react, but now they have. These rules changes may have been overkill, but they were aimed at dealing with paultards who are never going to vote for the eventual nominee no matter who it was (unless it was Paul of course).

8 posted on 08/29/2012 9:52:35 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl

http://www.selfgovernment.us/about.html


9 posted on 08/29/2012 9:53:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day Christians stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: cripplecreek

And then the next week at the convention when George Romney only got 40 votes to Goldwaters 800+ he stomped angrily out of the convention hall young impressionable Willard in tow and went and helped Johnson against the Republicans...


11 posted on 08/29/2012 10:03:02 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

REBEL PLAN FOR HOUSTON ACTIVISTS

What better way to strike back at this control-centered Republican party than to help usher in citizen legislation in a direct blow to the ONE issue targeting their class interests.Stop the Magnet needs 75 more volunteers committed by late September, won’t you please consider signing up at: volunteer@stopthemagnet.com? We actually have a good time interacting with voters and making new friends. Remember also that petitioners on voting sites get the longest “ear-time” with voters ESPECIALLY on the topic of illegal immigration. If you are worried about a candidate winning, we really don’t care who you support. We are after 20,000 signatures for placing our two enforcement propositions on the 2013 ballot.

Thanks for considering.


12 posted on 08/29/2012 10:04:29 AM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Me, too. I might be mistaken, but I think Rush busted the Paul meme, as well.


13 posted on 08/29/2012 10:06:38 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
“If a crying GOPe walked into our bar” … Throw him out!!!
14 posted on 08/29/2012 10:08:31 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
And then the next week at the convention when George Romney only got 40 votes to Goldwaters 800+ he stomped angrily out of the convention hall young impressionable Willard in tow and went and helped Johnson against the Republicans...

And the moderate purists have spent the last 50 years pointing to the Goldwater defeat that they engineered as proof that conservatives can't get elected.

Moderates are nothing but lying, manipulative, bottom feeding scum.
15 posted on 08/29/2012 10:08:31 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

If it was Paulnuts, you should inform Mark Levin; he disagrees.

As for the “hate” of the Romney wing of the party, doesn’t it bother you that conservatives now sling that word around as loosely as liberals ever have? Trying to personalize conservatives’ rejection of liberalism is beneath us.


16 posted on 08/29/2012 10:11:04 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
!

17 posted on 08/29/2012 10:13:44 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
While it didn't get any play on the national stage, I think this put some fear into them. Saul Anuzis was one of the morons who voted to change the rules after the primary in Michigan to save Romney the indignity of a tie. Just weeks later the people stripped him of his national committee seat.

Conservatives working in unison at the State Republican Convention sent a message to the establishment loud and clear: "It's our turn!"...No more `business as usual' politics orchestrated to appease the political masses with hollow claims of conservatism and principles each election cycle, only to disappear into the maze of lobbyists and special interests in the interim...This time, the false claims of an election year cycle fell on deaf ears, conservatism ruled the day...Libertarians, Tea Partiers, and true Republican conservatives unified in one of the most sweeping upsets of the incumbent power brokers I have seen in my lifetime...they have sent both the State and National GOP a clear ultimatum...This time we will not be silent, nor ignored, nor brushed aside...

We won!!!

Make no mistake, there's a war going on and only the GOP has something to lose.
18 posted on 08/29/2012 10:17:26 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Paulbots are not conservatives, just libertarians who realize their 3rd party is never going to get them anywhere.

So if you are in fact a conservative who wants to cast a vote for the candidate who truly means to deliver on a promise to limit the size of government, cut federal spending, and safeguard the rights of the individual, to what party do you turn?

Not the Republicans, that's for sure. Some of them talk a good game, but what they actually do is a different story. That being the case, the voter who actually wants government off his back may as well stay home come election day.

19 posted on 08/29/2012 10:25:58 AM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Reading that is very heartening. What worries me at the moment is the tendency of so many people to deliberately blind themselves to anything Romney and the GOP do. We need to see more of what happened in your state.


20 posted on 08/29/2012 10:30:04 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl
You're very late. The Republican Party has been a moderate party for many years. Why shouldn't the majority of the party do what it pleases?

(I left the party in 2007 rather than be a member of a moderate party. I'm voting for Romney since he is superior to Obama, and I'm not about to miss my chance to vote against him again.)

21 posted on 08/29/2012 10:33:21 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Oberon
So if you are in fact a conservative who wants to cast a vote for the candidate who truly means to deliver on a promise to limit the size of government, cut federal spending, and safeguard the rights of the individual, to what party do you turn?

The Republican party is the better of the two for those things you list. However, you're leaving off half of what makes a paultard. They also believe loopy info-wars conspiracy theories, abandoning Israel, that it's okay if Iran gets nukes, that a wall along the Southern border might be used to keep Americans from fleeing to Mexico, etc - you know the crazy stuff that makes it impossible for Ron Paul to really get an traction beyond his drug addled college mushhead following.

That being the case, the voter who actually wants government off his back may as well stay home come election day.

Most people realize that general elections are simply a choice between the 2 tickets that have any chance of winning. Voting for the least bad option is the norm in 2 party systems. It sucks, but that's just how it is. Maybe once or twice in your lifetime will you really have someone to get excited about voting for in a general election.

Paultards do not have some constitutional right to be in the GOP. If they aren't going to support it's nominees, then they should just go away. Maybe try taking over the Democrat party and see if they are more agreeable to an insurgency within their ranks who have no intention to support the actual party nominees.

23 posted on 08/29/2012 10:36:55 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
the voter who actually wants government off his back may as well stay home come election day.

There are plenty of indicators out there that little will change. Governors on both sides of the aisle are going full steam ahead with Obamacare. Even Mitt's buddy Rick Snyder here in Michigan is going ahead with a health care exchange by executive order against the wishes of the people or legislature.

The green energy sector isn't showing any signs of slowing down in anticipation of their funding being cut off. Industry bigwigs like Geoffry Imelt are supporting Romney now.

The Convention benediction was read by Rev Samuel Rodriguez who joined La Raza in a meeting amnesty with Obama last month.
24 posted on 08/29/2012 10:38:12 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
However, you're leaving off half of what makes a paultard.

I'm not talking about pro-Paul chauvinists... I'm talking about genuine conservatives. Forget about the Paulistas and answer me this: If I want smaller government, not just government growing more slowly than before or government growing in different ways through different means than the Liberals want but actually SMALLER government, who do I vote for?

Saying that the Republicans are closer to what I want in that regard misses the point. It's like telling a man who's thirsty for a drink of water that used fryer oil is closer to what he is looking for than Drano is.

Romney won't get my vote this year. I can see how our current president, a product of Chicago politics, is a bad idea; I don't see how voting for a product of Boston politics is any better.

25 posted on 08/29/2012 10:43:35 AM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
And the moderate purists have spent the last 50 years pointing to the Goldwater defeat that they engineered as proof that conservatives can't get elected.

They ignore the fact that Reagan did get elected while the moderates Ford, Dole and McCain did not.

26 posted on 08/29/2012 10:44:04 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“What does he care. He will be reelected in his district and he will be Majority leader until he wants to give it up or we lose the House.”

I said nearly two years ago that Boehner needed to be primaried, and if that failed he needed to face a strong third party challenger just to make an example of him. “Oh, no, we can’t afford to lose that representation!”

How much representation do you have now?


27 posted on 08/29/2012 10:51:56 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ( "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. The party left me." Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

“They dismissed it out of hand as a bunch of Paulnuts having a fit”

Yep. One thing the Geriatric Old Plotters can do well is coordinate lies.


28 posted on 08/29/2012 10:56:20 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ( "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. The party left me." Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
I’ll rest easy now knowing you are handling this.

You never know. It may come down to you or me.

29 posted on 08/29/2012 10:57:37 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (My game is disruption. I will use lethal force --my vote-- in self-defense against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
“paultards who are never going to vote for the eventual nominee no matter who it was (unless it was Paul of course).”

This election is a done deal. Paul is older than dirt and this was probably his last campaign. This is not about Paul - that's a Shibboleth. This is about purging conservatives and making sure no more conservative presidential candidates slip through the GOP defenses like Reagan did. If these rules stand, the GOP will never nominate another conservative for president because the party machinery is completely owned and controlled by the left. Similar techniques have been employed by academia to purge themselves of the “right wingers.”

30 posted on 08/29/2012 11:07:03 AM PDT by LaserJock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

“Geriatric Old Plotters”

Dang, I like that one a lot, LOL.


31 posted on 08/29/2012 11:14:10 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

He didn’t ignore the nos, he declared the Yay’s had it, and looking at the floor, he was right.

Don’t have to like the resolution, but what I saw sure didn’t give me the impression he ignored or improperly called the vote.


32 posted on 08/29/2012 11:21:48 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

wow - what a find, from history; you’re a great sleuth; thanks from all of us


33 posted on 08/29/2012 11:56:17 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

He is a phallic symbol.


34 posted on 08/29/2012 11:57:32 AM PDT by coon2000 (Give me Liberty or give me death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
And here is George Romney greeting Saul Alinsky.

Photobucket
35 posted on 08/29/2012 12:19:34 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LaserJock

A very astute observation.


36 posted on 08/29/2012 1:28:08 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Need this in California.


37 posted on 08/29/2012 1:30:06 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Wow. When?


38 posted on 08/29/2012 1:32:01 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

It was around the time of the Detroit riots and Romney brought Alinsky in to help solve the problems of Detroit.

Its like giving a 3 year old a loaded gun and sending him out on the playground to play cowboys and indians with the other kids.


39 posted on 08/29/2012 1:43:20 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Such a tainted family. How can the Republican party call him one of their own?


40 posted on 08/29/2012 2:47:09 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
If I want smaller government, not just government growing more slowly than before or government growing in different ways through different means than the Liberals want but actually SMALLER government, who do I vote for?

Your choice is the Republican or Democrat ticket. That's it. Those are the options. You can vote for whichever party is closer to your views (or at least contains people sympathetic to it), vote for the one furthest from your views, or take your ball and go home and waste your vote on some irrelevant candidate/party. I'm sorry, but those are your choices. Your chance to really make a difference is in party primaries. Very rarely in a 2 party system will you have a candidate to genuinely be excited about voting for in a general election. For many of us, that has never happened. For most, it was only Ronald Reagan. This is the way it will always be. Get used to it.

Your discontent should be directed at the founding fathers, who, like it or not, created a 2 party system with no possibility for coalition government. That means two party's will generally hug the center to get 50%+1 votes and win. So you can call for a constitutional convention I suppose, or shake your fist to the heavens, whine and cry, whatever, who cares. There are people who sit out every election on both sides. Go to a leftie forum and you'll encounter a lot of liberals who think Obama isn't leftwing enough so they refuse to vote. Go figure. So you are one less vote to help get rid of Obama. If that makes you feel good about yourself, more power to you I suppose.

41 posted on 08/29/2012 3:45:52 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Your choice is the Republican or Democrat ticket. That's it. Those are the options.

At this point, the best I can hope for is the dignity of not having co-operated with driving the nation over a cliff. Yeah, that's what's going to happen... but it will happen without me helping it along.

42 posted on 08/29/2012 6:55:58 PM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Watching the video: definitely hearing the no people were the majority. The fix was in before the vote, most definitley. There should have been a roll-call vote! This is so undemocratic!


43 posted on 08/29/2012 9:40:52 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson