Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Beowulf9

Yeah, Caligula wasn’t the worst behavin’ emperor, even among the Julio-Claudians, his failing was he didn’t accomplish anything. Sometime in the past, oh, five or ten years, someone I knew online said he’d read about a great pile of Roman-era dead (from the arena, presumably) which only started to decay when they were exposed to air during excavations under Mussolini. That too is ridiculous of course, probably was WWII-era propaganda.

One of the most believable fictional versions of Caligula can be found (of all places) in a book by Edgar Rice Burroughs. But alas, it just isn’t true (for the most part). If I were writing historical fiction about that time, I’d have Claudius as the key figure in the conspiracy to murder Caligula, I just don’t buy that a somewhat kooky, physically disadvantaged, chronically ill family scandal could be such a successful emperor (not least in surviving to become emperor) without having a hand in his own success.


19 posted on 03/28/2013 9:35:17 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Darn I like Edgar Rice Burroughs, too.

I can believe Claudius was a somewhat kooky, physically disadvantaged, chronically ill family scandal who became a successful emperor. He was not motivated by greed and when he got the job, just did it like a man who lived life humbled and took in a lot of knowledge for years.

Would like to get a guy like this in as President, but noooh, (as Belushi would say;)


22 posted on 03/30/2013 10:03:48 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson