To: skr
Did you read the story? The man coudn't take his friend AND injured dog down, so he opted to take the friend. He did not return because he thought the dog was already dead.
Tell me how you would prosecute that case.
17 posted on
08/18/2012 12:47:31 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: skeeter
he thought the dog was already dead. Me? I would have to know any dog I owned was actually dead.
Even if I thought they were, I would at least attempt a recovery for a decent burial.
19 posted on
08/18/2012 12:59:17 PM PDT by
null and void
(Day 1307 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
To: skeeter
He should have gone back to find out if the dog was dead.
This guy is just blowing smoke!
49 posted on
08/18/2012 2:02:46 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: skeeter
He didn’t bother to go back and look to be sure, now did he?
I would have, immediately.
I’d love to be on the jury of his “peers”.
70 posted on
08/18/2012 2:30:16 PM PDT by
Salamander
(Snakes. It had to be snakes.)
To: skeeter
He should have gone back up for the dog period. He blew it when he tried to “think”.
126 posted on
08/19/2012 11:20:59 AM PDT by
Emperor Palpatine
(Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!!!)
To: skeeter
I’ve read several articles; the facts are sparse. No mention of the younger person’s age or inability to help with the dog, and nothing indicating that any human injuries were involved. I wonder how this all went over with Ortolani’s companion?
He decided the dog must be dead after the local authorities declined to rescue an animal.
I hope we hear more details when a judge prosecutes his case.
133 posted on
08/20/2012 6:18:34 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson