Maybe you mean Reaganesque.
Romney is unlike Reagan in what he says, and Palin is unlike Reagan in how she says it.
Sorry, I'll have to give your brilliantly informative and well written thread a "fail".
Posted on 05/25/2012 3:08:27 PM PDT by bsdsan
Each are Reaganest, in how they speak.
Romney who?
What in the “H” is “Reaganest”?
Did you mean Reaganesque?
Maybe you mean Reaganesque.
Romney is unlike Reagan in what he says, and Palin is unlike Reagan in how she says it.
Sorry, I'll have to give your brilliantly informative and well written thread a "fail".
In what way is Romney Reaganesque? By being an older white man with carefully combed hair?
M’kay . . .
Only one can be the Reaganest, and I’d argue it’s Palin.
Gov. Palin is Reaganesque.
Milt Romney is a backstabbing, shapeshifting liar
who imposed BOTH RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE and
gay marriage (on his whim by his attack on the
clerks) as he disposed of the Mass. Constitution.
If at first you don't succeed, try, try, again!
First thing i thought was to see if it was by John Semmens.:)
Palin was an enthusiastic Reagan girl, and is the closest thing to Reagan since Reagan, and has always loved Reagan.
Romney despised Reagan, would not vote for him, and changed his party registration because of him, and has been trying to create a historical myth for five years, that Reagan was “adamantly pro-choice”.
Romney is anti-Reagan.
I didn't think it was possible for Romney to improve so readily so fast! ; )
He must have a great PR man.
I dunno. Picture me with torqued facial, and counter rotating eyeballs. Confoost!
Romney sucks.
What did Willard say about the Reagen years?
Oh Yeah, I don't want to return to Reagen/Bush
P.S. I don't think Romney would have (or will in the future) Sarah's run for the Presidency, she is too conservative for him.
nope...Reagan is the Reaganest....he is the "most Reagan" :D
Does Mitt, also, have a good FR man? That’s the question. FR and Mitt don’t go hand in hand.
Etch-a-sketch:
"I bet $10,000 that this thingy is the perfect size.
Tax this thingy, then have some illegal alien
or one of our own Legion of paid voters
superglue it on the roof of my wife’s
second Cadillac … for attention."
Reagan spoke from his principles. Romney’s words contradict his actions.
If Romney achives the presidency i dont imagine it’s going to be easy for him with Sarah there to remind him what it takes to be a “Severly Conservative” President.:)
(like)
A bull’s eye, hg!
A Reagan-o-meter of Reaganesqueness is a thread for the ridiculous.
Glomming any name or individual profile onto Reagan is an exercise in futility, but some small camps will try to do just that anyway.
I was thinkin' early W.
RINOmney Reaganesque????????
What are you drinking tonight?
Thank you for that AWESOME Palin gif. Made my day!
Willard is the ANTI-Reagan. Rotten Socialist liar and fraud to the core.
HEY! Lighten up! I had the same question initially. But then it occurred to me that if two people were competing to see which was more like the late Ronaldus Magnus, they would actually be proving which is the REAGENEST.
I can just hear Palin’s high-pitched voice shouting at Willard, “I’m Reaganer than you are! I’m actually the Reaganest Republican on the planet!”
I’ll put you down as ‘uncommitted’ to voting Republican this November.
(But there’s only one way to vote against Obama)
How can you call Romney backstabbing? Palin is the one who stabbed McCAin in the back by going rougue on him and still brags about it today. Romney has never said anything publically against Palin, but her bots have said plenty against Romney, continually. Palin to this time, is underhanded against Romney constanly on Fox News. Romney has shown much restraint in not going ballistic against her and her bots. It’s the exact opposite of what you say, Palin is the backstabber, just ask McCain, he lives with the shame every day of his life how her power hungry ways cost him, big.
Here are some facts unlike your misstatements about Gov. Palin.
FLASHBACK:
The McCain/Palin ticket was up ++4 to 10 pts
in some polls, days prior to Election 2008.
So rather than helping the GOP, Romney and
TeamROMNEY and the RNME (Republican National Media Establishment)
decided …to attack Gov. Palin to throw Election2008.
Romney, and the Van der Sloot RNME RINOs for Obama in 2008
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"I’m told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palin’s people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romney’s former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
… aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off ….hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
Poor sport spoiler Romney doing what he does best:
Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"
For too many people who call themselves Republican, that's apparently enough.
Everything you posted is propoganda, cut and paste smear, not grounded in truth. Actually, Palin is the backstabber as I already said. Just because you have spent the last 4 years, cutting and pasting the propoganda without truth to back it up, does not make it true, rather, that what I say is true. Propoganda is for those who tell lies. Truth doesn’t need to exaggerate the way propoganda tactics call for such as the ones you use on a regular basis. Cut and paste all you want, it’s still iies. Always has been, always will be.
Everything you posted is propoganda, cut and paste smear, not grounded in truth. Actually, Palin is the backstabber as I already said. Just because you have spent the last 4 years, cutting and pasting the propoganda without truth to back it up, does not make it true, rather, that what I say is true. Propoganda is for those who tell lies. Truth doesn’t need to exaggerate the way propoganda tactics call for such as the ones you use on a regular basis. Cut and paste all you want, it’s still iies. Always has been, always will be.
And furthermore, Palin’s own actions told on her during the campaign. Palin isn’t smart enough to hide her tracks. Anyone paying attention could see that Palin was in it for herself and was throwing McCain under the bus. McCain’s flabbergaseted staff saw it happen. They felt sorry for the old coot cause Palin, with her self-interest, made McCain seem pathetic during the campaign. Palin even bragged about it and wrote a book calling herself rougue, when the more truthful term is backstabber. You can’t blame Romney for Palin’s antics, or blame McCain’s staff for feeling sorry for the old fool. It’s was pitiful for them to see Palin run over the old guy like that. Don’t you blame Romney for Palin trying to run over McCain and costing the election, that falls squarely on Palin. People who were paying attention, don’t need propoganda to paint a picture, cause they saw it happen. It’s bad enough Palin pulled what she did, don’t go blaming Romney. Palin needs to learn to take responsibility for her own actions, but first it would help if some would stop making excuses for her and blaming others for her WRONGS!
What you wrote has no resemblance to the truth whatsoever. Palin’s contributions to the 2008 campaign kept the old fool from Arizona from being an unmitigated train wreck.
Going Rogue refers to her turning a deaf ear to the Romney Campaign retreads/now McCain Advisors that actively tried to sabotague both McCain and Palin.
Get help.
Wrong.
You and the truth are strangers.
Mitt and his pukes, then, stabbed Sarah in the back and now they are at it again. You will never get real Conservatives to pull the lever for your masshole liberal Constitutionphobe by attacking Sarah. Attacking Conservatives only guarantees more defections to Conservative 3rd parties.
America needs Palin. It doesn't need mitt. Not at all. If you want the help of Conservatives then you might want to back off on attacking Palin and be thankful that we might still show up and vote for Republicans down the ballot.
Yeah right, that’s what going Rogue was about, Romney? Then Palin needs help, cause not only was she the backstabber, but she declared war on Romney because she realized that he was a viable second runner, and she needed to destroy him to give herself a shot, as the failed VP backstabber who got caught. That woman is as devious as they come. She failed. Romney won. And Romney didn’t have to backstab McCain or write a book to blame someone else either for his failed plot, unlike Palin.
“Yeah right, that’s what going Rogue was about, Romney?”
No, the title was about, in part, former Romney staffers, now working for McCain’s campaign, their obvious attempts to discredit her, and her reaction to them. Their perfidy even extended beyond the 2008 Presidential season.
Meanwhile, Mitt himself kept his petticoats clean by using surrogates to sling the mud, and undermine the McCain/Palin campaign, just as he did throught the current primary season to the other Republican candidates. And Romneybots wonder why neither they, nor their man Mitt, are liked by Conservatives......
“....then Palin needs help, cause not only was she the backstabber...”
See my response above. Twist it all you want, but Romney and his campaign are slimey creatures and the backstabbing knives are theirs.
The rest of your post is just more of the same pure, unadulterated, BS.
Romney was, and still is, seriously upstaged by Sarah Palin as a charismatic political figure. He knows it, and has been at the forefront of a campaign to destroy her politically.....
Both Romneys, George and Mitt, had/have White House ambitions, something lacking in the Palin family history. He has not, and will not stop in his bid to realize that ambition..........Palin can, and has easily let that moment pass, So your logic does not follow.
It’s simply a case of Romney recognizing that Palin was a more sellable candidate than he, and using his considerable resources to make sure she was marginalized, and thereby eliminated as a potential opponet.
Easy enough to do...... the liberal left/MSM doesn’t like her either, and lent their support in that endeavor.
Besides, Romney, “We’re not returning to Reagan,” is not fond of conservative principals, or real Conservatives like Palin. So it was a two-fer for him.
If/when Romney wins the 2012 Presidention election it will be soley because of the citizens of these here United States choosing to take the WH away from Obama....nothing more or less....(ABO).... That Romney will be the recepiant of the national electorate’s desire to flush Obama, is the one and only reason he will be elected. Other than that he’d be a non-starter nationally.
Have you ever considered a position as a historical revisionist at an Liberal College/University? You should... You’re a natural talent! That said, let me add.... “You’re amazing!” /s
Nancy Reagan officially endorses Mitt Romney.
Nancy Reagan said that her late husband, Ronald Reagan, would have approved of a Romney presidency. “Ronnie would have liked Gov. Romney’s business background and his strong principles, and I have to say, I do, too,” Mrs. Reagan said in the statement. “I believe Mitt Romney has the experience and leadership skills that our country so desperately needs, and I look forward to seeing him elected president in November.”
Governor Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, visited Former First Lady Nancy Reagan at her Los Angeles home on Thursday. The Republican presidential candidate has been campaigning and raising money on the West Coast this week.
Sounds like Nancy did a good job of reading the statement Romney provided her. LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Seriously, testimonials like this are merely one form of propaganda. Something Romney is good at. Mitt’s visit to the Reagan household was not to pay homage to someone that Romney is on record of disliking and disagreeing with, but a self serving mission of pushing his political agenda, I’m not impressed, uh-uh not one bit...his record proceeds him.
As far as I am concerned my attention is on electing a Conservative enough Congress so that Mitt can be dragged kicking and screaming into governing as a “real” (small c) conservative, not as his usual phoney baloney used car salesman Liberal-lite self. To attempt to wrap himself in the mantle of a genunine Big C Conservative illustrates Mitt’s continued attempts at chameleon-like conservative facade. ABO is major thing that will bouy Romney up in 2012. The whole thing (Romney) makes me sick.
You’re wasting your time trying to drum up any enthusium for your man Mitt among informed Conservatives. Mitt’s a mutt, one that is marginally better than Obama........ So saddle up and ride back out on those dusty trails rodeo-momma. “Boy, it’s a drag riding drag. (for Romney). Looking up the rear of a big ole steer, boy it’s a drag riding drag!”
Get over it, Romney’s a good man, he always have been, you just didn’t notice. I hope you notice now. Those words from Nancy were heartfelt. It would do you good to notice. I am sure Romney would be more then happy to get your vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.