Skip to comments.
NASA swipes back at former astronauts over climate change
Daily Caller ^
| 12:06 AM 04/12/2012
| Alex Pappas
Posted on 04/13/2012 8:46:41 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
NASA is swiping back at a group of nearly 50 of its former scientists and astronauts who wrote to accuse the space agency of advocating the extreme position that global warming is the result of man-made carbon dioxide.
In a March 28 letter addressed to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, 49 former employees said the unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASAs history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.
But NASA responded on Wednesday by saying they dont draw conclusions and issue claims about research findings.
We support open scientific inquiry and discussion, NASA chief scientist Waleed Abdalati said in a statement provided to The Daily Caller.
If the authors of this letter disagree with specific scientific conclusions made public by NASA scientists, we encourage them to join the debate in the scientific literature or public forums rather than restrict any discourse, Abdalati said.
He added: NASA sponsors research into many areas of cutting-edge scientific inquiry, including the relationship between carbon dioxide and climate.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climate; climatechange; climategate; climategate2; giss; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; hansen; jameshansen; nasa; nasaletter
To: TigerLikesRooster; landsbaum; Signalman; NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Lancey Howard; ...
2
posted on
04/13/2012 8:47:37 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It must be frustrating for NASA when they’re unable to censor, intimidate, or threaten their former employees into silence.
3
posted on
04/13/2012 8:49:31 AM PDT
by
MeganC
(No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
NASA is a joke.
Poor management has killed 14 shuttle astronauts.
The fact that plants produce carbon dioxide is not “cutting edge.”
I guess making up BS to fit a political agenda is.
4
posted on
04/13/2012 8:52:23 AM PDT
by
MikeSteelBe
(Austrian Hitler was, as the Halfrican Hitler does.)
To: All
5
posted on
04/13/2012 8:52:39 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: MeganC
6
posted on
04/13/2012 8:54:28 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: MeganC
NASA was poisoned when it stopped looking out into space and started focusing on earth.
I remember in grad school taking grad physics and space science classes and it seemed all they were excited about was this new NASA earth observation program. I finally got to grad school in physics so I could inspired by early NASA, the moonwalk, Star Trek (yes as silly as that was!) and to these profs space stopped and ended in low earth orbit with all attention turned toward terra firma.
I much later find out it was all because of funding.
7
posted on
04/13/2012 8:57:31 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Why does NASA even care about this stuff? Aren’t they supposed to be focused on helping Muslims feel good about Islam?
8
posted on
04/13/2012 8:57:42 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
... cutting-edge scientific inquiry,including the relationship between carbon dioxide and climate. Cutting-edge scientific inquiry?
But, I thought that it was settled, concensus-based fact that only "deniers" questioned.
9
posted on
04/13/2012 8:59:03 AM PDT
by
Washi
(Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse, one head-shot at a time.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
NASA is no longer a scientific organization.
(Apologies to all real scientists there...a set that does not include the climate clowns..or the “management”.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If the authors of this letter disagree...., we encourage them to join the debate in the scientific literature... Abdalati said.That would be fine if the warmists did not prevent counter-argument papers being published in said literature.
11
posted on
04/13/2012 9:01:48 AM PDT
by
expat2
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hey NASA! Where’d the Ice Age go? Man-made climate change a factor there too? Or could it be any change is cyclical? Oh...cyclical means you can’t use the excuse to tax it.
12
posted on
04/13/2012 9:07:00 AM PDT
by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What a bunch of petulant, unprofessional jerks NASHOLE has become.
13
posted on
04/13/2012 9:08:28 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gee...I’m old enough to remember when every American could be proud of NASA.
14
posted on
04/13/2012 9:12:46 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
(Rick Santorum 2012. Conservative's last, best chance!)
To: ClearCase_guy
..................Arent they supposed to be focused on helping Muslims feel good about Islam................
“Waleed Abdalati” ??? Maybe they are - doesn’t sound like an Amish name!
15
posted on
04/13/2012 9:18:51 AM PDT
by
Noob1999
(Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gee. This is a tough one for me. Who should I listen to?
Waleed Abdalati or Michael Collins?
Waleed Abdalati or Harrison Schmitt?
Waleed Abdalati or Walter Cunningham?
Waleed Abdalati or Charles Duke?
Waleed Abdalati or Richard Gordon?
Waleed Abdalati or Ed Gibson?
Waleed Abdalati or Christopher Kraft?
Waleed Abdalati or Al Worden?
Boy, am I ever conflicted on this.
16
posted on
04/13/2012 9:23:35 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: Reily
Nothing silly about that at all. How many people entered the sciences over the years because of Jules Verne?
Nothing silly there. I recently watched some episodes of Star Trek on Netflix, and it was hard to watch without observing with chagrin the liberal-speak that was in much of the campy script, but that was back when it was still okay to be principled about something, and to use force to defend those principles when circumstances required it.
I watched several episodes and smiled with nostaligia at the campiness...:)
Now, my tastes go more towards something like “GalaxyQuest”!
17
posted on
04/13/2012 9:30:16 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(A knife in the chest from a unapologetic liberal is preferable to a knife in the back from a RINO.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Universetoday.com has a loaded article entitled "Letter to NASA is Common Ploy in Climate Change Denial".
The authoress's creds just made me want to stop subscribing to a couple of podcasts.
I expected better of Universe Today. The article comments run the gamut.
To: Reily
I much later find out it was all because of funding.
NASA's big mistake? Not finding a way to launch rockets fueled with with milk & cheese.
An old joke aimed at the agricultural types at the time, such as Proxmire and Mondale.
To: rlmorel
I thought Galaxy Quest was hilarious!
It's rare that satire can be such a gem, but it skewered every sacred SciFi (particularly Star Trek!) cow but it a way that was not offensive.
20
posted on
04/13/2012 10:09:28 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“Cutting edge scientific inquiry” my arse. It’s a RELIGION!
21
posted on
04/13/2012 10:18:14 AM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: rlmorel
and you can actually study the earth legitimately!
Anyone remember or hear about IGY International Geophysical Year (1957-1958)?
22
posted on
04/13/2012 10:19:50 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“NASA chief scientist Waleed Abdalati”
We are so screwed.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We support open scientific inquiry and discussion, NASA chief scientist Waleed Abdalati said Waleed Abdalati is a liar.
"The debate is over."
"There is a consensus."
"Deniers! Flat-earthers!"
Waleed Abdalati can go play in the street. He's not fit to shine the shoes of any astronaut.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"But NASA responded on Wednesday by saying they dont draw conclusions and issue claims about research findings.
I bet if they where told they no longer can fund anything related to GISS, they would take a quick turn around in their thinking.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"He added: NASA sponsors research into many areas of cutting-edge scientific inquiry, including the relationship between carbon dioxide and climate.
Sure they do. Like Hansen changing raw data input into his useless programs when he sees fit to hide the declines.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

feh...
27
posted on
04/13/2012 2:56:34 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: rlmorel
28
posted on
04/13/2012 5:00:15 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The Global Warming HOAX is about Global Governance)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
29
posted on
04/13/2012 6:12:40 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
To: pgkdan
...and proud of our government, too; even the President.
(Sigh!) Days long past, and most unlikely to return.
30
posted on
04/13/2012 8:38:55 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: Reily
Antarctic ice cores. Ozone hole (Oops!) USS Nautilus to the North Pole. Van Allen Belts. Project MOHO.
Project MOHO?!?
Anyone hearing that today would think it was referring to a Hip-Hopper candidate’s political slogan. “Elect me mayor and I will enact Project MoHo: 2 B****s in every crib!”
31
posted on
04/13/2012 8:54:55 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: ApplegateRanch
Yes by the way if I remember correctly the Ozone studies then were correctly (as we know now!) attributing the fluctations in Ozone (the “hole”) to natural causes.
I thought MOHO was so so cool!
32
posted on
04/14/2012 6:28:49 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: ApplegateRanch
Yes by the way if I remember correctly the Ozone studies then were correctly (as we know now!) attributing the fluctuations in Ozone (the “hole”) to natural causes.
I thought MOHO was so so cool!
33
posted on
04/14/2012 6:29:01 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: rlmorel
Let me guess NASA is now required by law to have to hire Muslims via affirmative action? Waleed Abdalati was hired on his merits or because he was Muslim? Do Muslims even believe there is an outter space in their 12th century mindset?
To: Marine_Uncle
But NASA responded on Wednesday by saying they dont draw conclusions and issue claims about research findings.Hmm. Wasn't this one of their documented problems regarding warnings from Morton Thiokol engineers about launching Challenger in sub-zero temperatures?
35
posted on
04/23/2012 10:18:10 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
RE: "Hmm. Wasn't this one of their documented problems regarding warnings from Morton Thiokol engineers about launching Challenger in sub-zero temperatures?"
I can't say I remember that issue. But I get where your coming from.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson