Posted on 03/11/2012 11:46:08 AM PDT by Politics4US
"The release of the highly anticipated videotapes of Barack Obama speaking at an affirmative-action rally when he was a student at Harvard Law School “fell flat,” revealing little about the president’s radical past that wasn’t already known, contends talk radio host Michael Savage.
“Was there a screaming Obama railing at the top of his lungs about the evils of white oppression? No,” Savage said on his “Savage Nation” show last night. “Was there a beret-wearing Obama with an AK-47? No.”
Savage said the video promised by Andrew Breitbart before he died last week “shows basically the same Obama you’d hear on the stump today.”
“The same monotonous cadence, the same haughty demeanor,” Savage said. “If this was supposed to be a blockbuster revelation, there wasn’t much block to bust.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
OK...... chocolate gives me a headache........ so I guess I am vanilla.
Oh, I see. You were talking about Clinton to divert attention away from Obama. Never mind.
The point is these people who voted for Obama just don’t care. He could have performed late-term abortions or engaged in pagan sacrifices, it won’t matter. That’s the electorate we have in this country today.
I stopped listening to Savage when he had “Chuckie” Schumer on his show, in opposition to the Dubai ports deal. Savage practically gave him an on-air Lewinsky because someone in the ruling political class was paying attention to him.
The Rev. Wright tapes came out after Super Tuesday for the Democrat Primary in 2008.
The leftist media is playing their card #3, which is to pretend something's no big deal (card #1 is saying something is "hateful," card #2 is saying something is "racist"). Hell, if THEY say it's no big deal, how can it possibly be a big deal? They're the arbiters of what's important, right? If they shrug their shoulders, so should we, right?
Andrew Breitbart was right--the mainstream media is the real evil here. The real enemy. That video was disgusting, and no shoulder-shrugging Soledad O'Brien, doing her propagandistic best to get me to shrug MY shoulders is going to convince me otherwise.
I was listening, also, when Mike had Charlie Schumer on the air:
Schumer came on, and Mike dove to his kness, so thirsty he was the the essence of Someone Truly Important:
An entirely different and tame Savage appeared —it was disgusting, in the extreme.
In fact Mike had Schumer on the air not one but TWO times —kissing his ass liberally both times until it was pink and shiny.
This made it clear to me:
Mike basically wants to be accepted as One of The Elite —he does not really care about his fan base, or about Conservativism at large.
The old Mike who once clanged the phone down on San Mateo’s serpent-tongued (and now finally dead) Tom Lantos is dead, apparently.
what was new to me is it appears they are trying to use the Critical Race Theory to undermined our legal system. It is more than a racial bias. More like racial activism. Includes massive redistributing wealth.
The law is applied unequally, based on your race and life struggles.
“Now you are standing for Jesus Christ. Will you remain standing if the Communists threaten to take your life?”
Hmmm...One of the nuns at my school asked the same question . And that was many moons ago in the 60’s .
Yeah, it was not a bombshell.......but if this is the first trickle of some more serious tapes to come, it’s a start. We never had theO on tape with his promotion of the good REVJerryWrong. That would have been better.
Either Ogletree was just wrong (or idly kidding) or he was talking about something not in the the video.
Because the video was extracted from a PBS puff-piece on Obama's illustrious days as president of the Harvard Law Review, which aired before the 2008 election: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5m6YFBcixo. The amazing thing was, he could actually give a short speech without a teleprompter.
Either Ogletree was just wrong (or idly kidding) or he was talking about something not in the the video.
He wasn't wrong and he wasn't kidding/joking IMO. He appeared proud about keeping the video hid.
Well, I hope you are right that Ogletree was right about hiding something significant. It better be bigger than what we've seen so far, however. It needs to be something not already on Frontline, spun favorably, before the election. I would like to see Obama himself spouting directly the sentiments of his many radical associates.
Hopefully, this was simply the initial stage of Breitbart's heirs expertly executing his time-release methodology.
What a stupid game you're playing. Even children can see through what you're doing.
So weak! You need more than "a" clue.
Clue - Ogletree. Clue - We hid it!
That will get no traction at all.
So why won't the Ogletree video get traction? I can show you a dozen research threads from right here on FR where traction has already been made.
I'll see if maggief can enlighten you.
I hate to bother you, maggief, but could I persuade you to post some of the information that current research has found since the release of the Ogletree video so that fish hawk and his "conservative friend" won't remain ignorant any longer?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0zW7sLsvGI
Sorry, but I'll trust tactics and judgment of Mr. Brietbart and Mr. Pollak over the “All-Knowing Keyboard Warriors” on this forum.
Oh, and Savage is nothing but a bitter old man. He seems to have nothing but jealousy and contempt for his colleagues in the business.
What a stupid game you're playing. Even children can see through what you're doing.
And what game would that be? Moron baiting? It's a guilty pleasure hard to resist when you've got the facts on your side.
Video of Obama kidnapping Patty Hearst would be a “dud” after CNN, etc., were done. Breitbart’s contribution here is the peeling back of Obama submerged associations. On the tapes, Obama enthusiastically endorses Derrick Bell, the prime exponent of Critical Race Theory, an intellectually vapid, blatantly racist vision. But do Obama’s actions and associations fit the CRT agenda? Let’s see, under the CRT mindset:
Black Panthers with clubs at polling places are ok because they protect blacks from the institutionalized propensity of whites to suppress the black vote. Stopping the Justice Department from pursuing crimes by blacks redresses years of persecution under the law.
Requiring photo id’s at polling places is per se racist, because legal documents, birth certificates, legitimate id cards, etc., are creations of the “white” system of law, used to exclude and exploit blacks and minorities. Voter fraud is necessary to even things up.
American law facilitates the exploitation of the have nots by the haves, especially on a racial basis; therefore,
“spreading the wealth around” through “entitlements” (like ObamaCare) is necessary to achieve social justice.
The feelings of a “wise Latina” are a better source for rulings than what the law actually says, because laws are made by whites to perpetuate white power. Facts and justice are relative to one’s ethnicity.
Nope, nothing there. I guess introducing “Critical Race Theory” into the discussion of what makes Obama tick was a useless dud after all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.