Posted on 03/11/2012 11:46:08 AM PDT by Politics4US
"The release of the highly anticipated videotapes of Barack Obama speaking at an affirmative-action rally when he was a student at Harvard Law School “fell flat,” revealing little about the president’s radical past that wasn’t already known, contends talk radio host Michael Savage.
“Was there a screaming Obama railing at the top of his lungs about the evils of white oppression? No,” Savage said on his “Savage Nation” show last night. “Was there a beret-wearing Obama with an AK-47? No.”
Savage said the video promised by Andrew Breitbart before he died last week “shows basically the same Obama you’d hear on the stump today.”
“The same monotonous cadence, the same haughty demeanor,” Savage said. “If this was supposed to be a blockbuster revelation, there wasn’t much block to bust.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Andrew used the term videoS
Unless his crew loses their nerve expect a slow release of videos over the next months.
Of course! You remember how those kids who busted ACORN did it: Drip, drip, drip. More videos will be released.
You must also understand that other networks and investigative reporters may have possibly, without question been intimidated to not show the Obama Harvard video.
What the tape shows is the mindset of people who Obama associated with and he continued the relationship after he became President. IMHO Obama saw nothing wrong with the thought process of these people. Newt will make hay of it but I am not sure about Rick or Mitt.
Mike, your endorsing Jerry Brown fell flat.
Agreed. Way too often there is the promise of some big bombshell and it’s nothing but a popper. This was one major dud.
Unsurprisingly, Mike has had a long series of producers (full disclosure: I never was one). The daughter of KGO-ex Jim Eason also was one, and he gave her the same terrible treatment.
Hey, performance standards are GREAT —we need more of that in the USA. But Mike doesn’t just have those, no. He’s needlessly venomous, and he meets out EXACTLY the type of treatment to others that he decries towards him from others, like ex-bosses, professors, journalists and particularly his father.
The word, hypocrite is used more and more —now to a fault, I believe— but it fits Mike to a “T”: Mike is a big, fat hypocrite.
He should be more like his son, who is both a high-achiever and also genuinely NICE. Same with his wife. It’s juuuust Mike who is the jerk.
Americans need educating on the irrationality of leftist radicalism. They may take awhile to get the thing about Bell, that he hates white people because he enjoys doing it, not because it does any good or serves any purpose, or because he has any reason left for doing it. To radicals like Bell, hate, envy, disrupting the peace of society, and destroying this nation aren’t means to an end. It’s a life style. If he can get stupid white people to join him, so much the better.
How do you know about how he’s treated his producers?
> Weak tea?
> What is more shocking when you actually do the research on Bell, et al, is that our media elite actually agree with them.
It’s weak because this has already been surfaced about Zer0. Since it has nothing new, it has little chance of catching outside those of us who are already onboard with knowing Zer0’s agenda.
Sorry, but that’s reality.
More than anyone? More than Levin? Doubt it.
Yes it was , no real surprises with the tape in and of itself. The real point I found in the tape was it underscored how much the MSM is carrying water for this asshat in the WH. Journalistic malpractice at its finest, especially when you contrast the treatment Herman Cain got.
Your question is a natural one, but if the cost of protecting my sources and methods is being accused of being a liar, then....I’m OK with that, yes.
I know that anyone who has really listened to Mike’s show KNOWS that my story isn’t fanciful.
Mike’s mean to the left, sure (many loved him for that —I certainly did) but he’s also mean to HIS OWN TEAM.
--No no no! I reject this idea that we should just shrug our shoulders and buy the PBS/Buzzfeed line that there’s nothing new here. Stop it! This is news!
They didn’t want to talk about it then and they don’t want to talk about it now. Do you think it’s a coincidence of timing that Barack Obama has now hired people to put out some 17-minute documentary?
This is all about Alinskyite control of who tells the story. Well guess what Barack Obama and Jim Messina. It is not all your monopoly anymore and that’s why they are pushing back so hard. It is not ‘nothing’!
It is very crucial! --
For anyone over 45 years old, did you ever in your wildest dreams think this would be such a true statement?
“Evidently he doesn’t know how Briebart works.”
Please, would you be willing to elaborate? I’d be interested in a better understanding of what you mean here. You have given the conclusion, which I don’t dispute, but I’d like to hear your thinking.
The tape didn’t even rise to the level of “ho-hum”. Those who promoted it as the ultimate ‘gotcha’ polotical catch of the century should be ashamed of themselves. These ‘impotent’ stunts hurts the image of those on the right wanting so desperately to get the goods on the impostor in chief. This was embarrassing to say the least, IMHO.
And old saying goes something like this:
“If you can’t kill the king, then you shouldn’t attempt it”.
To me, this means that if you attempt to bring down “the king” or in this case, Obama, and you fail, then this makes him stronger. IOW, when you go after the king, make ABSOLUTELY SURE you bring him down or else, he’ll bring you down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.