“Evidently he doesn’t know how Briebart works.”
Please, would you be willing to elaborate? I’d be interested in a better understanding of what you mean here. You have given the conclusion, which I don’t dispute, but I’d like to hear your thinking.
It goes like this:
BB makes a minor charge, which draws a major denial from the left —they offer some explanation.
THEN BB rolls out additional evidence that makes plain the great lie contained in the initial denial.
This then triggers much teeth-gnashing, yelling, and rambling back-tracking. Then a back-up explanation/denial is issued.
THEN BB rolls out something really huge (something that wasn’t disclosed at first) that drags the entire group of lefty apoligists down the bar counter, pushing all manner of peanuts, beer, and sending drinks crashing onto the barroom floor.
Then the victim is pummeled, kicked into silence and finally pee’d upon.
THAT is how is goes.
Breitbart (and those who carry on his legacy now) is a master at having things trickle out little by little. Generally he saves the juiciest bits for last so this isn’t the end of it.
Cindie