Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kimoajax

There were plenty of meaningless factoids. She remembers what she was wearing but can’t remember the exact date. And show me a CEO who will (out of the blue) have dinner with an employee who was fired (with just cause, I might add). This busy man, without her making an appointment...if she did it wasn’t through his Administrative Assistant...would somehow make contact with this person. How did she contact him? How likely is it she had his private number? Why the heck would she go to the CEO to get a job back (who wouldn’t be responsible for a low level hires). Anyway, she checks into her room. Did she make contact with him? How? Did she call the NRA? Because I don’t know a CEO who answers his own phone, do you? The point of an AA is to screen him from frivolous things like this. And even if she had contacted him ahead of time wouldn’t he take the time to look at her file? Seriously there are way too many holes here.

Oh, and if I was going to have a little tryst with some trashy little skank, I wouldn’t ask her to service me in a car. I’m going back to the cushy room. There is absolutely no logic to this woman’s story. Did she find this plot in a porn movie or something?

Cindie


14 posted on 11/08/2011 3:30:18 PM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gardencatz

Excellent analysis. You can always tell a liar by the way they embellish, and by how they give an over-detailed account.

This part was hilarious: “He reached for my genitals.” ROFL! Without the aid of a table with stirrups?


17 posted on 11/08/2011 3:35:25 PM PST by Palladin (Newt/Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: gardencatz

All true, Cindie, but I still think that critical analysis of the likelihood of her statement won’t be nearly as effective as disproving the hotel claim or some such thing. At this point, someone has to *demonstrate* that she’s lying, not just argue that it’s likely. I know that the burden shouldn’t have to be on Cain, but this is politics and that really is what someone needs to do. The press won’t dig (except for Geraghty at NRO), because they want Cain gone. So they spin and spin (the lazy bums). At the end of the day, Cain doesn’t get off without contrary proof. I hate it, but that’s what he needs.


18 posted on 11/08/2011 3:38:32 PM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: gardencatz

Cindie,

You suffer from an overabundance of common sense. Get with the narrative! Evil Black conservatives just want white women to molest. /sarc off


28 posted on 11/08/2011 4:20:05 PM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: gardencatz
And show me a CEO who will (out of the blue) have dinner with an employee who was fired (with just cause, I might add).

Ditto that. She was wearing a tattoo on her forehead which said..."trying to entrap the CEO of the firm that just fired me."

Cain has been around the block...he ain't gonna fall for that.

But if you have an authoritative source for her cause for separation, I would like it so I can spread it around. Word is that she was fired for false accusations of "sexy harassment"...but no source of substance has been offered (just that Macsmind blog IIRC).

Please provide update if one is available.

34 posted on 11/08/2011 4:57:16 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Politics ain't beanbag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson