1 posted on
11/03/2011 3:00:44 PM PDT by
Strk321
To: Strk321
Definitley not on one of my places to “must visit”...
2 posted on
11/03/2011 3:03:15 PM PDT by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: Strk321
Why was this passed? Did someone actually do that in a public establishment?
To: Strk321
If I was wearing socks would I be considered naked?
4 posted on
11/03/2011 3:05:14 PM PDT by
donhunt
(Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
To: Strk321
This must be a mistake...I think they meant to say eating in a restaurant requires all patrons to be naked, that is more in keeping with SF moral codes.
5 posted on
11/03/2011 3:05:54 PM PDT by
PoloSec
( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
To: Strk321
“San Francisco bans naked dining”
Why? Seems like it’s a victimless crime. If you’re going to allow gay marriage, then why ban people from eating while they are naked?
6 posted on
11/03/2011 3:09:27 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: Strk321
Seriously...they do that there??
8 posted on
11/03/2011 3:14:23 PM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: Strk321
San Fransicko is the last place you’d want to have children.
9 posted on
11/03/2011 3:15:24 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Strk321
No smoking, no clothing. So many rules.
Shirt, shoes, no service.
/s/
To: Strk321
If you make another crack like that I'm not going to serve you!
14 posted on
11/03/2011 3:23:11 PM PDT by
Average Al
(Forbidden fruit leads to many jams.)
To: Strk321
All this nakedness is due to GLOBAL WARMING!!
15 posted on
11/03/2011 3:23:52 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Strk321
Back in the 60s, I was staioned out in the San Francisco area. It was a nice place then.
Too bad that the liberals and leftists have turned it into such a disgusting cesspool. You couldn’t PAY me to go to Frisco today.
I have to wonder, though, is Tony Bennet’s heart still there??
16 posted on
11/03/2011 3:24:01 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: Strk321
Wait.....no nude dining in a city that bans happy meal toys? They preach tolerance and all, yet no tolerance for nude diners? Hmmm they should call the ACLU.
17 posted on
11/03/2011 3:35:29 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: Strk321
San Francisco is now being run by those were outcasts in our former society. Now everyone gets to face what these people are. What they value. How they behave.
18 posted on
11/03/2011 3:45:53 PM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: Strk321
To: Strk321
Good thing I’m living in Chicago! *takes off pants and grabs a fork*
To: Strk321
24 posted on
11/03/2011 4:39:49 PM PDT by
SouthernBoyupNorth
("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
To: Strk321
Please - what ever happened to “No Shirt, no shoes - no service”?
25 posted on
11/03/2011 4:45:55 PM PDT by
Godzilla
(3/7/77)
To: Strk321
That’s Nancy Pelosi’s district - no, I can’t bear that picture.
26 posted on
11/03/2011 4:57:53 PM PDT by
Marcella
(Newt will smash Obama in debates. Newt needs money.)
To: Strk321
To: Strk321
San Fran, you are banning NAKED DINING?? Wow...
I feel safer now...
30 posted on
11/17/2011 2:53:07 PM PST by
ExCTCitizen
(Cain/West 2012....what would the RACISTS LIBERALS say???)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson