Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FreeBSD: A Faster Platform For Linux Gaming Than Linux?
Phoronix ^ | September 7th | Michael Larabel

Posted on 09/11/2011 8:47:53 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

FreeBSD provides a Linux binary compatibility layer that allows 32-bit Linux binaries to be natively executed on this BSD operating system. Linux binary compatibility on FreeBSD allows Linux-only applications to be executed in a near seamless manner on this alternative platform, even for games. New tests have revealed that the modern FreeBSD operating system (via PC-BSD 8.2) can actually outperform Linux when it comes to running OpenGL Linux game binaries.

This Linux binary compatibility support for FreeBSD is commonly referred to as "Linux emulation", but it is not emulating Linux in a traditional sense nor is it acting like Wine in user-space. This is a Linux ABI implementation for the FreeBSD kernel.

(Excerpt) Read more at phoronix.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: bsd; freebsd; linux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2011 8:48:00 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Been playing with Free BSD for a long time but also branched to Open BSD which is considered secure.


2 posted on 09/11/2011 8:51:44 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Could you summarize in lay language for non-techies?


3 posted on 09/11/2011 8:56:28 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (Obama's jobs speech: re-arranging deck chairs on his Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck
How much support? Compatibility and support is and always will be the issue.

Linux seems to be pretty good. It has finally come into its prime.

Running Ubuntu on my laptop right now and I love it.

4 posted on 09/11/2011 9:00:27 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Portions of BSD are used in the Apple OS X operating system. It is popular with the techie, software types.

It is even farther removed from the mainstream than Linux.


5 posted on 09/11/2011 9:06:00 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

If you’re evaluating a game in terms of 3D graphics performance, Linux wins because of its superior support for graphics chipsets. The FreeBSD developers almost overwhelmingly are focused on disks & filesystems, networking, etc for work-related stuff, although they may be racing to catch up with new de-facto standards. FreeBSD people want a well-thought out environment that’s mostly BSD licensed, not restricted to a 500 clause GNU license. There’s a big variety of Linux distros that suck, but both OS’s rely on the huge library of ever-improving GNU software, and Linux has different priorities. Linux is ahead of the curve with small embedded platforms like cellphones (Android). iphones, etc have BSD code in them, but they aren’t FreeBSD.


6 posted on 09/11/2011 9:08:44 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

I thought anything Apple was for non-techie geriatric hippy types. If they make up the mainstream, we’re screwed.


7 posted on 09/11/2011 9:16:56 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

You obviously though wrong. Or maybe you just didn’t think.


8 posted on 09/11/2011 9:53:07 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Henry Hnyellar

Ha-rumph! to you, too.


9 posted on 09/11/2011 10:02:46 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

Good point. Apple have certainly made it more mainstream. Still a small subset of overall PC platforms.

But what this article is referring to is BSD derived from Linux.

BSD derived from Linux seems like a folly to me. Nothing ever works as planned. Fun for the techie type — like building a Frankenstein. A cool idea but is it useful? And is it useful to mainstream folks.


10 posted on 09/11/2011 10:06:17 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

Ha-rumph.? Who are you, Governor William J. Lepetomane?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN99jshaQbY&feature=related


11 posted on 09/11/2011 10:24:52 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

The problem with FreeBSD are the Christian hating maggots who produce it.

It is an extremely efficient and stable OS, but I cannot stomach the people who developed it.


12 posted on 09/11/2011 10:29:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
FreeBSD has offered Linux ABI compatibility almost as long as the FreeBSD project has been around, ie when it essentially broke off from William and Lynne Jolitz's stagnating 386BSD. When I started using in 1996 or 97, it offered fairly good Linux userland ABI compatibility then. That didn't mean that FreeBSD doesn't have its own ABI, it does. It just means that when the FreeBSD encounters a Linux executable file, it can pretend to be Linux so that it can run that executable. This normally doesn't impact the "BSD" part of FreeBSD at all, it's just a little extra source code. In fact, people were often bragging about how much more efficiently Linux-compiled programs ran on FreeBSD back in 1997. Both OS's have evolved quite a bit since then.

There's been some tinkering that could make it possible to use some Linux drivers with FreeBSD. Technically, that's a different problem entirely because graphics drivers usually don't live in "userland". But FreeBSD already provides kernel modules that allow you to use Windows network card drivers. It's just another option available to you if FreeBSD doesn't yet offer native support for some of your hardware.
13 posted on 09/11/2011 10:33:31 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

Whether an OS is “mainstream” anymore is rapidly becoming irrelevant in a world where most mainstream computer users are doing their most sophisticated computing with smartphones. You can make Linux or FreeBSD or even Windows work as a desktop OS, but Windows has almost all of the commercial software out there. Even then, most mainstream users are usually just web browsing, and that can be done with any OS that can run a decent (and for the most part free) web browser. The infrastructure that provides content for your web browser can be just about any decent OS, not necessarily a “mainstream” one.


14 posted on 09/11/2011 10:57:54 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

Perhaps there will come a day when somebody can someone can take a perfectly functional Android phone on their Verizon/AT&T/tracfone plan and put a Linux/FreeBSD-based, completely open source OS onto it ...and still get it to work with whatever wireless broadband provider that they want to use.


15 posted on 09/11/2011 11:06:13 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

Speaking about smartphones, has anyone come up with a “FreeRepublic” app yet? Think about it.


16 posted on 09/11/2011 11:20:15 AM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293
Mainstream meaning market share. And those OSs with the largest market share tend to have the best support with everything from games to useful applications and most importantly drivers for hardware.

Besides, an OS is useless if you can't find drivers for your hardware. Linux was lame just a few of years ago but is now pretty well supported.

Right now Windows is out in the lead. Mac is in second. Linux is third. Unix in its various forms is probably in there somewhere with BSD in its raw form?... in last place.

Also, until they improve the UI for smart phones, a larger format will always necessary. I have an Android phone but by far prefer typing on this blog with my laptop. My thumbs are too fat! The Ipad is an attempt at a compromise. But it is still a compromise. Nothing like a full keyboard.

17 posted on 09/12/2011 8:31:45 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293
I guess my point is why bother. I have paid my penance years ago searching hours on the Internet ad nauseam for Linux drivers for my hardware only to find out that “it doesn't work as promised.” Even though the drivers may be cross compatible there is always some issue so why mess with it.

On the other hand, if I am a tech software type, I might enjoy it. But I am not.

Anyway, Linux is finally in its prime and an excellent free OS. Just as long as they don't mess with it which it appears they are doing. I hate the latest version of Ubuntu.

That is just my two cents.

18 posted on 09/12/2011 8:52:15 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293

Interesting idea.


19 posted on 09/12/2011 8:57:42 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yup2394871293
I actually looked. Unfortunately one doesn't exist. Accessing it via the web interface is okay. Not great but okay. The Michelle Malkin and Drudge Report apps are pretty good.

I am using an Android.

20 posted on 09/12/2011 9:01:38 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson